9 34. That, with respect to the aforesaid operative paragraph, the representatives stated that the “State’s proposal was unclear” and that it was “[…] impossible to know the person or persons that [would be] responsible, on behalf of […] the State, for compliance […]”. They added that they would soon submit a proposal to the State regarding the obligation to provide housing to the victims, prepared in collaboration with them so that such measure does not interfere with the customs, ways of life, and culture of the inhabitants of the village (supra Having Seen clause No. 3). 35. That, as regards said operative paragraph, the Commission noted that the information available in relation to specific aspects that are essential for compliance with the orders of the Court was insufficient (supra Having Seen clause No. 4). 36. That the Court notes that, in accordance with the aforesaid operative paragraph, the State must develop a housing program for the benefit of the surviving victims who reside in the village of Plan de Sánchez and require the same within five years following notice of the Judgment. 37. That, even though the period for compliance with said operative paragraph has not expired, the Court finds that the State has provided little information regarding the steps taken toward compliance; therefore, the Court calls upon the State to report on the progress made so as to ensure compliance with the provisions of the Judgment within the specified period (supra Having Seen clause No. 1). * * * 38. That, as regards the ninth operative paragraph (supra Having Seen clause No. 1), the State informed, in relation to paragraph 9(a), that the Academy of Mayan Languages, through the Achí linguistic community, was conducting a research study regarding the time necessary for the study and dissemination of the Maya-Achí culture in the affected communities. In relation to paragraph 9(b), that the Ministry of Communications informed “[…] of the significant progress […] made in the formal project and the improvements in the road system between the [communities affected by the massacre] and the municipal capital of Rabinal […].” In relation to paragraph 9(c), that the FOGUAVI had put forward the possibility of “[…] undertaking the sewage and potable water supply” together with the housing project. In relation to paragraph 9(d), the State has failed to provide specific information regarding the supply of teaching personnel trained in intercultural and bilingual teaching, as set forth in the Judgment. In relation to paragraph 9(e), the State noted that, until 2005, the health care center located in the village of Plan de Sánchez “[…] was classified as a convergence center, [and that] it is currently an enhanced health care facility[,] given that it provides medical and psychological care[. …] A nursing assistant was appointed, [who] provides basic health care from 8 am to 4 pm, Monday to Friday [,…] the doctor sees patients twice a month […, two] psychologists provide their services every Monday [and] the facilities were painted[… .] The tap water and electrical installation remain to be completed. […A] medical-surgical equipment was provided on loan [and] a plan for the implementation of psychosocial relief efforts was prepared” (supra Having Seen clause No. 2). 39. That, in relation to the aforesaid operative paragraph, the representatives noted that “[…] the State has not provided […] much information about each one of the aspects to be complied with” and requested that the Court require the State to provide information on the housing program; the study and dissemination of the Maya-