Quispialaya Vilcapoma
Case- Summary
The proceedings conducted before the military jurisdiction determined that the injuries resulted from the victim’s service. Likewise, the criminal justice also failed to establish liability.
The IA Court developed standards on the role of State as guarantor of persons under its custody, establishing the particular situation of those who perform military service. It also reiterated its previous assessment of the scope of the military court’s jurisdiction.
- Status
- Active
- Country
- Presentation to the IACommission
- Feb 3, 2004
- Submission to the IACourt
- Aug 5, 2014
- IACommission / Merits report: rights violated
ACHR IACPPT 5.1, 5.2, 1.1 8 8, 25, 1.1 5.1, 1.1
- IACourt / Judgment: rights violated
ACHR IACPPT 5.1, 5.2 - 8.1, 1.1 - 8.1, 25, 1.1 1, 6, 8 25.1, 1.1 - 5.1, 1.1 -
- IACourt / Judgment: rights non-violated
ACHR 2
- Descriptors
- Detention conditions
- Military jurisdiction
- Military service
- Court documents
- Osorio Rivera, J, Penal Castro Castro, Tarazona Arrieta y ots, Espinoza Gonzáles, Cruz Sánchez y ots, Canales Huapaya y ots, Comunidad Santa Bárbara, Quispialaya Vilcapoma, Tenorio Roca y otros. Order of the IACourt. November 14, 2017
- Quispialaya Vilcapoma. Hearing. August 24, 2015
- Quispialaya Vilcapoma. Judgment. November 21, 2016
- Quispialaya Vilcapoma. Judgment. November 23, 2015
- Quispialaya Vilcapoma. Order of the IACourt. March 19, 2015
- Quispialaya Vilcapoma. Order of the President. June 24, 2015
- Documentos de la comisión
- Geolocalización de los hechos
- Geolocalización de los hechos (linked Place of the events)
- Quispialaya Vilcapoma
Documents
Attachments
11 connections, 11 documentssorted by: