3 unanimously, 11. […] that the State violated, to the detriment of Luis Alberto Cantoral Benavides, Articles 2, 6 and 8 of the Inter-American Convention to Prevent and Punish Torture. unanimously, 12. […] that the State should order an investigation to determine the persons responsible for the violations of human rights referred to in [the] judgment, and punish them. unanimously, 13. […] that the State should make reparations for the injury caused by the violations. unanimously, 14. […] to open the reparations stage, to which end it commissions its President to take such measures as may be necessary. III PROCEEDINGS IN THE REPARATIONS PHASE 3. On September 13, 2000, the President of the Court (hereinafter “the President”), in furtherance of the Court’s finding in operative paragraph fourteen of the Judgment on the merits, decided as follows: 1. To grant the representatives of the victims or, if applicable, their next of kin, a period until November 13, 2000 to present their arguments and available evidences for the purpose of determining reparations and costs. 2. To instruct the Secretariat of the Court to transmit all the received briefs and evidences to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, once the period referred to in the above paragraph has expired. 3. To grant the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights a one-month period, starting on the date it receives the aforementioned briefs and evidences, to submit the comments it deems relevant to the subject of reparations and costs. 4. To instruct the Secretariat of the Court to forward all the submitted briefs and evidences to the State of Peru, once the period referred to in the above operative paragraph has expired. 5. To grant the State of Peru a two-month period, starting on the date it receives the briefs and evidences referred to in the above operative paragraph, to present its comments and available evidences with a view to determine reparations and costs in the instant case. 6. To summon the representatives of the victims or, if applicable, their next of kin, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, and the State of Peru, once the written procedural stage has concluded, to a public hearing, at a date that shall be informed in due time. 4. On November 9, 2000, the victim’s representatives petitioned the Court seeking a forty-day extension on the time period set by the Court for filing the brief and evidences on reparations. On November 13, 2000, acting on the Court’s instructions, the Secretariat of the Court (hereinafter “the Secretariat”) extended the time period until January 5, 2001.

Select target paragraph3