11 58. That in its last report dated January 11, 2008, the State repeated information already forwarded in former reports and it restricted itself to make a recount of the notes, communications and official letters sent to State entities during year 2005, which request information on the operative paragraphs pending compliance. 59. That it is essential that the State submit updated information, that is, from the last report, on the actions taken to completely fulfill the next aspects of the reparations Judgment pending compliance, in the terms of Considering clauses 10, 13, 27, 36 and 42: a) the payment of the compensation to Mr. Martín León-Lunazco, son of victim Máximo León-León (operative paragraph 2.c of the reparations Judgment rendered on November 30, 2001); b) the payment of the interest in arrears regarding the compensations of beneficiaries Cristina Ríos-Rojas, daughter of deceased victim Manuel Isaías Ríos-Pérez, and Rocío Genoveva Rosales-Capillo, daughter of deceased victim Alejandro Rosales-Alejandro (declarative paragraph 3.d of the Decision of September 22, 2005 and operative paragraph 2.b of the reparations Judgment rendered on November 30, 2001); c) the payment of the amount corresponding to the interest in arrears owed to Maximina Pascuala Alberto-Falero (operative paragraph 2.b and final subparagraph in consistency with paragraph 36 of the Reparations Judgment of November 30, 2001); d) the duty to investigate the facts to ascertain those responsible for the violations of the human rights referred to in the Judgment on the merits, as well as to publicly release of the results of said investigation and the punishment of the responsible parties (operative paragraph five of the Judgment on the merits of March 14, 2001); e) the health services provided (operative paragraph three of the reparations Judgment rendered on November 30, 2001); f) the educational services provided (operative paragraph four of the reparations Judgment rendered on November 30, 2001); g) the progress in the inclusion of the “legal concept resulting most convenient for typifying the crime of extrajudicial killings” (operative paragraph 5.b of the reparations Judgment rendered on November 30, 2001), and h) the memorial monument which must be erected (operative paragraph 5.f of the reparations Judgment rendered on November 30, 2001). 60. That the Court shall consider the general status of compliance of the Judgments on the merits of March 14, 2001 and of reparations of November 30, 2001, respectively, once it receives the pertinent information regarding the operative paragraphs pending fulfillment.