9 42. That it is necessary that the State provide updated information regarding the typification of the crime of “Extrajudicial Killings” in the criminal Peruvian legislation (operative paragraph 5.b of the reparations Judgment of November 30, 2001). * * * 43. That in the Order of September 22, 2005, the Court requested the State to submit updated information on the building of a memorial monument in honor to the victims of the instant case (operative paragraph 5.f of the reparations Judgment of November 30, 2001). 44. That the State informed that on January 17, 2006, a letter was sent to the Municipality of Lima requesting updated information on the matter. However, to date Peru has not forwarded said information to the Court. 45. That the representatives argued that, “the State has failed to comply with the erection of the memorial monument to honor the victims of the events which took place in Barrios Altos”. 46. That the Commission did not forwarded any observations on that matter. 47. That according to the reparations Judgment, the “monument [would] be built within the term of 60 days after the execution of the agreement”, at a place agreed upon between the parties, in coordination with the Metropolitan Municipality of Lima. 48. That more than six years have gone by since the Judgment on Reparations, without the State having complied with this obligation. 49. That it is necessary that the State adopt immediate actions so as to effectively comply with this reparation measure and to inform the Court on said measure in an updated an detailed manner (operative paragraph 5.f of the reparations Judgment of November 30, 2001). * * * 50. That in the Order of September 22, 2005, the Court requested the State to inform on the publication of the complete text of the Judgment on the merits rendered by this Court in the El Peruano Official Gazette and its release in other means of communication (operative paragraph 5.d of the reparations Judgment of November 30, 2001). 51. That in the brief of February 2, 2006, the State informed that the abovementioned Judgment was published on December 30, 2005, in newspaper “El Comercio”. The State submitted a copy of said publication. 52. That the representatives confirmed that the Judgment on merits was published in December 2005, in a newspaper of national circulation. Nonetheless,