8 d) Manage the donation of official texts for students of primary and secondary levels. In “subsequent years” this donation can be managed "through the Editing Houses which offer official texts to the Board of Education"; and e) Support with uniforms, school material and other (“donations and other requested contributions can be channeled through stores or entities related to the sector.”) 35. That more than six years have gone by since the rendering of the reparations Judgment, without the State having shown any fulfillment of these obligations. 36. That it is necessary that the State immediately adopt actions to effectively comply with these operative paragraphs and include –in its next reports to be submitted before this Court- a detailed description thereof (operative paragraphs three and four of the reparations Judgment rendered on November 30, 2001). The representatives should specifically inform the Court: 1) the name, age and place of residence of the beneficiaries of the reparations ordered who must receive the educational services pointed out in the agreement; 2) the educational services which are still in force, taking into account the time gone by since the execution of the agreement; 3) the name, age and place of residence of the beneficiaries of the reparations ordered who must receive the educational services pointed out in the agreement, and 4) if possible, the name of the health institutions corresponding to the different domiciles of the beneficiaries, where the State is forced to provide attention with no charge. * * * 37. That in the Decision of September 22, 2005, the Court requested information regarding the progress in the inclusion of "the legal concept resulting most convenient” to typify the crime of extrajudicial killings (operative paragraph 5.b of the reparations Judgment rendered on November 30, 2001). 38. That the State informed that, on January 23, 2006, the Executive Power representative before the Review Commission of the Penal Code forwarded the Executive Secretariat of the National Board of Human Rights a report in which the content of the third book of the Penal Code referring to Crimes against International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law is included, where, in Title II, “the [crime] of Extrajudicial Killings, Torture and Forced Disappearance, among other Crimes Against Humanity, is typified.” In accordance with the report of the State, “said bill [...] is with the Review Commission of the Republic Congress awaiting to be passed.” 39. That the representatives pointed out that “the State has not yet fulfilled the typification of the crime of Extrajudicial Killings and its inclusion in the Peruvian [P]enal [C]ode.” 40. That the Commission pointed out that, “it continues to expect the pertinent information which proves that the State has complied with this obligation.” 41. That the information submitted by the State in its last report dates from year 2006.