93 a measure of satisfaction, the State must publish in the official gazette Diario Oficial and in another national-circulation daily, once only, the operative part of this Judgment and the chapter on proven facts in this same Judgment, without the respective footnotes.184 189. This Court deems that Honduras, in the framework of the general obligation set forth in Article 2 of the Convention, must implement, if it does not yet exist, a record of detainees to enable control of legality of the detentions, which must therefore include identification of the detainees, the reason for their detention, the competent authority, the day and time of admission and of release, and information on the arrest warrant. XVI LEGAL COSTS AND EXPENSES Pleadings of the representatives of the victim 190. The representatives of the victim requested reimbursement of legal costs and expenses amounting to US$28,190.58 (twenty-eight thousand one hundred and ninety United States dollars and fifty-eight cents), for expenses incurred in their search for justice in the instant case, both domestically and internationally. They specifically requested the following amounts: US$19,597.72 (nineteen thousand five hundred and ninety-seven United States dollars and seventy-two cents) for legal costs and expenses incurred by COFADEH; US$8,592.86 (eight thousand five hundred and ninety-two United States dollars and eighty-six cents) as reimbursement for expenses incurred by CEJIL; and to set an amount in fairness for CODEHUCA. Pleadings of the Commission 191. The Commission argued that the Court must recognize reasonable costs incurred by the legal representatives in the domestic ambit and before the bodies of the inter-American system for the protection of human rights, and the Commission stated that it “endorse[d] the claims made by the representatives of [the next of kin of the victim regarding reparations].” Pleadings of the State 192. The State pointed out that payment of “compensations” to the attorneys who intervened is not in order, such as those of the Inter-American Commission or those of the Center for Justice and International Law, CEJIL, since they “perform a function for a remuneration set for them by the [body] to which they belong.” Considerations of the Court 184 Las Palmeras Case, Reparations, supra note 4, para. 75; El Caracazo Case, Reparations, supra note 4, para. 128; and Trujillo Oroza Case, Reparations, supra note 22, para. 118.