28 security forces” through the “Law on Access to Public Information,” and the “Law for the Protection of Procedural Subjects and People Linked to the Administration of Criminal Justice.” The representatives manifested the insufficiency of the information presented by the State and indicated that access to information in the army’s case files “has not been materialized.” 60. The Commission “value[d]” the adoption of measures “to clarify past disappearances,” but mentioned that “it does not have enough elements” to issue a ruling on these measures. 61. The Court values the efforts made by the State in order to comply with this Operative Paragraph of the Judgment. However, it considers that it still requires more information on the different initiatives mentioned, especially regarding the measures of protection for procedural subjects and access to the information in the army’s files. 62. THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, in exercising its power to monitor compliance with its own decisions pursuant to Articles 33, 62(1), 63(2), 67 and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, 30 of its Statutes, and 31 and 69 of its Rules of Procedure, DECLARES: 1. That the following obligations are pending compliance: a) To locate the mortal remains of Mr. Efrain Bámaca-Velásquez, exhume the remains in the presence of his widow and next of kin, and subsequently hand them over to them (operative paragraph one of the Judgment on reparations); b) To adopt legislative, and any other measure necessary, to adjust Guatemalan legal codes to international human rights regulations