10 correctional facility.11 In the present matter, the Inter-American Commission moved this Court to order protection for the inmates and other persons present in the Araguan Correctional Facility. For the purposes of this request, the potential beneficiaries are identifiable because they are persons who are either presently detained, able to enter as an inmate in the future, or someone who may regularly or eventually enter as an official or visitor to the facility. 14. The State must take all relevant steps so that the provisional measures mandated in the present Order are planned and implemented together with the participation of the representatives of the beneficiaries, leading to their prompt and effective realization. The Court notes the affirmative participation of the State and, particularly, the representatives is necessary in order to coordinate implementation of provisional measures in this case. 15. The adoption of these provisional measures does not prejudge State liability for the events reported. THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, in the exercise of the powers conferred by Article 63(2) of the American Convention on Human Rights and Articles 27 and 31 of the Court’s Rules of Procedure, DECIDES: 1. To ratify in all respects the Order of the President of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of November 1, 2010 and, consequently, to require that the State maintain in place any measures currently in progress of implementation, in addition to immediately and definitely adopting any complementary measures that may be necessary and effective to avoid loss of life or harm to the physical, mental, and moral integrity of those incarcerated in the Araguan Correctional Facility, also known as Tocorón prison, as well as any others who may be present therein. 2. To require that the State undertake all relevant steps to ensure that the protective measures mandated in the present Order are planned and implemented together with the participation of the representatives of the beneficiaries and, in general, that the State keep the parties informed as to progress in their execution. 11 Cf., inter alia, Matter of Urso Branco Prison. Provisional Measures regarding Brazil. Order of the InterAmerican Court of Human Rights of June 18, 2002, Considering clause nine; Matter of Capital El Rodeo I and El Rodeo II Judicial Confinement Center, supra note 5, Considering clause twenty-one; and Matter of Children Deprived of Liberty in the “Complexo do Tatuapé” of FEBEM. Provisional Measures regarding Brazil. Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of July 3, 2007, Considering clause six.