2 […A]llow the beneficiaries of the measures of protection or their representatives to participate in the planning and implementation of these measures and […], in general, […] keep them informed about progress in the measures ordered by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. 3. The reports submitted by the State and the corresponding observations presented by the Commission and the representatives of the beneficiaries, in relation to the provisional measures ordered by the Court (supra Having seen paragraphs 1 and 2). 4. The Order of the Court of January 24, 2007, in which it found that the request for “expansion of the provisional measures” of January 22, 2007, submitted by the beneficiaries of the provisional measures and their representatives was inadmissible, “because the persons who submit[ted] it did not have the required legal standing to present it”. 5. The application against Venezuela submitted by the Inter-American Commission on April 20, 2007, concerning the case of Luisiana Ríos et al. (No. 12,441). 6. The notes of May 21, 2007, from the Secretariat of the Court (hereinafter “the Secretariat”), notifying the said application to the parties. 7. The brief of May 26, 2007, received by the Secretariat by e-mail the same day, together with the appendixes received two days later, in which eight persons,3 seven of whom are alleged victims identified in the application (supra Having seen paragraph 5),4 submitted a request for the adoption of provisional measures. In the request they also state[d] that it [was] submitted by “the other journalists, personnel and management of [RCTV] […,] acting on [their own] behalf and also on behalf of and in representation of other the other persons, journalists, management, and the other personnel working for RCTV.” In this request they stated, inter alia, that: (a) The applicants have legal standing to present the request “as journalists, management and personnel of RCTV[, because they are alleged] victims and petitioners in a case” before the Court; (b) Following the last order on expansion of the provisional measures ordered by the Court on September 12, 2005, “new and subsequent facts [allegedly] occurred, that augmented as of December 28, 2006.” They pointed out that these facts referred to “the formal announcement of the shut-down of the activities of RCTV owing to the non-renewal of the license of this social communication medium; actions taken by the State to formalize the decision to be applied at midnight on May 27, 2007; the rejection of all the measures of judicial protection taken by the national authorities; [the precautionary ruling issued by the Constitutional Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice on May 25, 2007], depriving RCTV of […] its assets, and placing these under the control and for the use of the new television station created by the State (TEVES) to occupy the RCTV VHF frequency”; (c) “The recent actions of the State […] entailed a renewed failure to comply with its international human rights obligations[, since] they directly and intentionally contravened the conclusions and recommendations of the Commission in its Report based on Article 50 of the Convention and, consequently, the claims submitted in the Commission’s application, [exposing the petitioners] to greater damage than that already caused [them] in a virtually irreparable manner”; Luisiana Ríos, Isabel Mavarez, Isnardo Bravo, David Pérez Hansen, Antonio Monroy, Javier García Flores, José Pernalete and Eduardo Sapene. 4 José Pernalete is not an alleged victim in the application mentioned in paragraph 5 of this Order. 3