-10assess full compliance with this measure, it is necessary for the State to prove compliance with the radio broadcasts, so that the name of the broadcasting radio station and the dates and languages of the broadcasts can be identified. 3. That, in accordance with Considering clauses No. 10 and 11 of this Order, it will keep open the proceeding for monitoring compliance with the points pending compliance in the instant case, namely: a) The adoption, within a reasonable time period, of such legislative measures as may be required to provide for a simple, fast and effective judicial remedy to review any decisions of the Supreme Elections Council that may affect human rights, such as the right to participate in government, in compliance with the relevant legal and treaty guarantees, and the revocation of any provisions preventing said remedy from being pursued (ninth operative paragraph of the Judgment of June 23, 2005); b) The amendment of Elections Law No. 331 of 2000, so that it will clearly regulate the consequences of non-compliance with electoral participation requirements, the procedures to be followed by the Supreme Elections Council for a finding of non-compliance, and the reasoned decisions to be adopted by the Council in that regard, as well as the rights of those whose participation is impaired by a decision of the State (tenth operative paragraph of the Judgment of June 23, 2005); c) The amendment of the regulation of those requirements laid down in Elections Law No. 331 of 2000 that were found to be in violation of the American Convention, and the adoption of such measures as may be required for members of indigenous and ethnic communities to be able to effectively take part in election processes, with due regard to their traditions, uses and customs (eleventh operative paragraph of the Judgment of June 23, 2005). d) Payment of the compensation set for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, which amount is to be paid to the YATAMA organization, to be thereupon distributed by the latter as appropriate (twelfth operative paragraph of the Judgment of June 23, 2005); e) Payment of the amount due on account of costs and expenses incurred domestically and internationally before the Inter-American system for the protection of human rights, to the YATAMA organization, which shall subsequently deliver to CENIDH and CEJIL such portion thereof as may be required to reimburse the latter for any expenses defrayed by them (thirteenth operative paragraph of the Judgment of June 23, 2005); and f) The publication, via broadcast by a radio station with a large coverage area in the Atlantic Coast, of the required paragraphs of section VII (Proven Facts) and of sections IX and X and the operative paragraphs of the Judgment in Spanish, Miskito, Sumo, Rama and English, at least four times at intervals of two weeks (eighth operative paragraph of the Judgment of June 23, 2005). AND DECIDES: 1. To call upon the State to adopt such measures as may be necessary to promptly and effectively comply with the pending aspects ordered by the Court in the

Select target paragraph3