-9d) Payment of the compensation set for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, which amount is to be paid to the YATAMA organization, to be thereupon distributed by the latter as appropriate (twelfth operative paragraph of the Judgment of June 23, 2005). In this regard, the State provided information on the steps taken to comply with this measure of reparation; e) Payment of the amount due on account of costs and expenses incurred domestically and internationally before the Inter-American system for the protection of human rights, to the YATAMA organization, which shall subsequently deliver to CENIDH and CEJIL such portion thereof as may be required to reimburse the latter for any expenses defrayed by them (thirteenth operative paragraph of the Judgment of June 23, 2005). In this regard, the State provided information on the steps taken to comply with this measure of reparation. 12. That the Court will consider the general status of compliance with the Judgment on preliminary objections, merits, reparations and costs of June 23, 2005 once it is provided with the relevant information on the pending reparations. THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, by virtue of its authority to monitor compliance with its own decisions pursuant to Articles 33, 62(1), 62(3), 65, 67 and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, and Articles 25(1) and 30 of its Statute and 29(2) of its Rules of Procedure, DECLARES: 1. That, in accordance with Considering clause No. 9 of this Order, the State has fully complied with its obligation to: a) Publish section VII (Proven Facts), paragraphs 153, 154, 157 to 160, 162, 164, 173, 175, 176, 212, 218, 219, 221, 223, 224, 226 and 227 from sections IX and X, dealing with the violations found by the Court, and the operative paragraphs of the Judgment at least once in the Official Gazette and in another large nation-wide circulation newspaper (sixth operative paragraph of the Judgment of June 23, 2005); and b) Publish the full text of the Judgment on the State’s official web site (seventh operative paragraph of the Judgment of June 23, 2005). 2. That, as stated in Considering clause No. 10 of this Order, the State has partially complied with its duty to publicize, via broadcast by a radio station with a large coverage area in the Atlantic Coast, the required paragraphs of section VII (Proven Facts) and of sections IX and X, and the operative paragraphs of the Judgment in Spanish, Miskito, Sumo, Rama and English, at least four times at intervals of two weeks (eighth operative paragraph of the Judgment of June 23, 2005). As stated in Considering clause No. 10 of this Order, it is the Court’s view that, in order for it to