instrument, to the detriment of Segundo Aniceto Norín Catrimán, Pascual Huentequeo Pichún Paillalao, Juan Patricio Marileo Saravia, Florencio Jaime Marileo Saravia, José Benicio Huenchunao Mariñán, Juan Ciriaco Millacheo Licán and Patricia Roxana Troncoso Robles, in the terms of paragraphs 268 to 291 of this Judgment. unanimously that: 5. The State violated the right to personal liberty, established in Article 7(1), 7(3) and 7(5) of the American Convention on Human Rights, and the right to the presumption of innocence, established in Article 8(2) thereof, in relation to Article 1(1) of this instrument, to the detriment of Segundo Aniceto Norín Catrimán, Pascual Huentequeo Pichún Paillalao, Víctor Manuel Ancalaf Llaupe, Juan Patricio Marileo Saravia, Florencio Jaime Marileo Saravia, José Benicio Huenchunao Mariñán, Juan Ciriaco Millacheo Licán and Patricia Troncoso Robles, in the terms of paragraphs 307 to 358 of this Judgment. unanimously that: 6. The State violated the right to freedom of thought and expression, established in Article 13(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation to Article 1(1) of this instrument, to the detriment of Segundo Aniceto Norín Catrimán, Pascual Huentequeo Pichún Paillalao and Víctor Manuel Ancalaf Llaupe, in the terms of paragraphs 370 to 378 of this Judgment. unanimously that: 7. The State violated the political rights established in Article 23(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation to Article 1(1) of this instrument, to the detriment of Segundo Aniceto Norín Catrimán, Pascual Huentequeo Pichún Paillalao, Víctor Manuel Ancalaf Llaupe, Juan Patricio Marileo Saravia, Florencio Jaime Marileo Saravia, José Benicio Huenchunao Mariñán, Juan Ciriaco Millacheo Licán and Patricia Roxana Troncoso Robles, in the terms of paragraphs 379 to 386 of this Judgment. unanimously that: 8. The State violated the right to the protection of the family established in Article 17(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation to Article 1(1) thereof, to the detriment of Víctor Manuel Ancalaf Llaupe, in the terms of paragraphs 401 to 410 of this Judgment. unanimously that: 9. It has insufficient evidence to allow it to conclude that the State violated the right to the protection of the family established in Article 17(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, to the detriment of Segundo Aniceto Norín Catrimán, Pascual Huentequeo Pichún Paillalao, Juan Patricio Marileo Saravia, Florencio Jaime Marileo Saravia, José Benicio Huenchunao Mariñán, Juan Ciriaco Millacheo Licán and Patricia Roxana Troncoso Robles, in the terms of paragraph 411 of this Judgment. by four votes to two, that: 10. It is not incumbent on the Court to rule on the alleged violation of the right to an impartial judge or court, established in Article 8(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, in the terms of paragraphs 193 and 229 of this Judgment. 153