CEJIL

- Library
- Sign in

Diego García-Sayán Alberto Pérez Pérez Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Secretary So ordered, Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto President Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Secretary 156

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

Uwazi is developed by
CEJIL
Library
Login

Info
19Relationships

Search Tips

Search text

Type something in the search box to get some results.

I-INTRODUCTION OF THE CASE AND PURPOSE OF THE DISPUTE2
II–PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COURT6
III–COMPETENCE11
IV–PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS2
A)Determinationof the presumed victims2
1.Arguments of the parties12
2.Considerationsof the Court12
B)Determinationof the factual framework15
1.The pre-trial detention measures15
2.The initial arrestsand their judicial control16
3.Allegations of violence during the initial arrestsand inhumane detention conditions16
C)Time-barred arguments17
V–EVIDENCE2
A)Documentary, testimonial and expert evidence2
B)Admission of the evidence18
1.Documentary evidence18
2.Admission of the statements of presumed victims,and testimonial and expert evidence23
VI–FACTS23
A)The presumed victims in this case23
B)Context 24
1.TheMapucheindigenous people24
2.The social protestof the Mapuche indigenous people25
C)Domestic legal framework2
1.Constitution33
2.Criminal law34
3.Criminal procedural laws2
D)The criminal proceedings held againstthe presumed victims38
1.The criminal proceedings againstLonkos Segundo Aniceto Norín Catrimánand Pascual Huentequeo Pichún Paillalao,and against PatriciaRoxana Troncoso Robles38
2.The criminal proceedings againstJuan Patricio Marileo Saravia, Florencio Jaime Marileo Saravia, José Benicio Huenchunao Mariñán, Juan Ciriaco Millacheo Licánand Patricia Roxana Troncoso Robles42
3.The criminal proceedings againstVíctor Manuel Ancalaf Llaupe47
VII –MERITS51
VII.1–PRINCIPLE OF LEGALITY(ARTICLE 9 OF THE AMERICAN CONVENTION)AND RIGHT TO THEPRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE(ARTICLE8(2))OF THE AMERICAN CONVENTION, IN RELATION TO THE OBLIGATION TO RESPECTAND ENSURE RIGHTSAND THE OBLIGATION TO ADOPT DOMESTIC LEGAL PROVISIONS52
A)Argumentsof the Commissionand of the parties52
B)Considerationsof the Court55
1.The principle of legalityin general and in relation to the codification of terrorist acts56
2.Application to this specific case2
3.Obligation to adopt domestic legal provisions(Article2of the American Convention),in relation tothe principle of legality(Article9of the Convention)and the right to the presumption of innocence(Article8(2))61
VII.2–RIGHT TO EQUAL PROTECTION(ARTICLE24OF THE AMERICAN CONVENTION)AND JUDICIAL GUARANTEES(ARTICLE8(1), 8(2)(F)AND 8(2)(H)OF THE AMERICAN CONVENTION), IN RELATION TO ARTICLE1(1)63
A)Right to equal protection(Article24of the Convention)and right to be tried by an impartial court (Article8(1)of the Convention), in relation to Article1(1)of the Convention65
1.Argumentsof the Commissionand of the parties65
2.Considerationsof the Court68
B)Right of the defense to examinewitnesses(Article8(2)(f)of the Convention) in relation to the criminal proceedings against Messrs.Norín Catrimán, Pichún Paillalaoand Ancalaf Llaupe82
1.Pertinent facts82
2.Argumentsof the Commissionand of the parties84
3.Considerationsof the Court85
C)Right to appeal the judgment to a higher court(Article8(2)(h)of the Convention), in relation to the obligations underArticles 1(1) and2of this treaty, with regard to SegundoAniceto Norín Catrimán, Pascual Huentequeo Pichún Paillalao, Juan Patricio Marileo Saravia, Florencio Jaime Marileo Saravia, José Benicio Huenchunao Mariñán, Juan Ciriaco Millacheo Licán and PatriciaRoxana Troncoso Robles3
1. Argumentsof the Commissionand of the parties91
2.Considerationsof the Court92
3.Obligation to adopt domestic legal provisions101
VII.3 –RIGHTS TO PERSONAL LIBERTY AND TO THE PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE (ARTICLES 7(1),7(3), 7(5)AND 8(2) OF THE AMERICAN CONVENTION)103
A)Argumentsof the Commissionand of the parties2
B)Domestic legal framework104
C)Considerationsof the Court108
1. General considerationsonpersonal liberty,pre-trial detention,and presumption of innocence108
2. Examination of the alleged violations112
3. Alleged non-compliance with the obligation established inArticle2of the American Convention(Domestic legal effects)122
VII.4–FREEDOM OF THOUGHT AND EXPRESSION, POLITICAL RIGHTS,AND RIGHTS TO PERSONAL INTEGRITY AND TO THE PROTECTION OF THE FAMILY (ARTICLES13, 23, 5(1)AND 17OF THE AMERICAN CONVENTION)124
A)Argumentsof the Commissionand of the parties2
B)Considerationsof the Court126
1.Right tofreedom of thought and expression126
2.Political rights3
3.Right topersonal integrity130
4.Right to the protectionof the family133
VIII –REPARATIONS136
A)Injured party137
B)Measures of restitution, rehabilitation and satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition137
1.Measure of restitution: nullify the criminal convictions imposed on the victims137
2.Measures of rehabilitation: medical and psychologicaltreatment139
3.Measures of satisfaction140
4. Guarantee of non-repetition: adaptation of domestic law in relation to the right of the defense to examinewitnesses141
C)Compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage142
D)Costs and expenses146
E)Other measures of reparation requested3
F)Reimbursement of the expenses of theVictims’ Legal Assistance Fund151
G)Method of complyingwith the payments151
JOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGESMANUEL E. VENTURA ROBLES AND EDUARDO FERRER MAC-GREGOR POISOT157

Norín Catrimán y otros. Judgment. May 29, 2014

IACourt judgment

Preview

Type

Costs
Merits
Reparations

Date: May 29, 2014

Mechanism

Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos

Number: C-279

Country

Chile

Signatories

Alberto Pérez Pérez
Diego García-Sayán
Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot
Eduardo Vio Grossi
Manuel E. Ventura Robles
Roberto de Figueiredo Caldas

Separate vote

Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot
Manuel E. Ventura Robles

Primary Documents

Norín Catriman et al. Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment. May 29, 2014.pdf
English
Download View
Norín Catriman y otros. Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas. Sentencia de 29 de mayo de 2014.pdf
Spanish
Download View
Norín Catriman y otros. Sentença de 29 de maio de 2014.pdf
Portuguese
Download View

Supporting files

Norín Catriman et al. Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment. May 29, 2014.doc1.45 MB

Norín Catriman y otros. Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas. Sentencia de 29 de mayo de 2014.doc1.26 MB

Norín Catriman y otros. Sentença de 29 de maio de 2014.docx788.28 kB

No References

References are parts of this document related with other documents and entities.

No Label1
- Case1
IACourt Documents8
- Order of the President IACHR2
- Order of the IACourt4
- Hearing2
Signatories5
- Judge and/or Commissioners5
Mecanismo1
- Mechanism1
País1
- Country1
Signatory Separate Vote2
- Judge and/or Commissioners2
Separate Votes1
- Separate vote1

Create Reference

Select relationship type

Relacionado a
CorteIDH
CIDH
Votos separados
Paises
Jueces intervinientes
País
Multi Select
Mecanismo
Firmantes
Sexo
Tipo
Firmante Voto separado
Estado
Descriptores
Geolocalización de los hechos del caso
Medidas de Protección

Search Tips

Connect to a paragraph

Connect to an entity

Disable highlights

Add to table of contents

Notifications

You're all caught up

New activity will show up here.