3 9. Decide[d], for the sake of equitableness, that the State must pay the group of 270 workers mentioned in paragraph 4 of th[e] judgment the amount of US$100,000 (one hundred thousand U.S. dollars) as reimbursement for expenses generated by the steps taken by the victims and their representatives, and the amount of US$20,000 (twenty thousand U.S. dollars) as reimbursement for costs, from internal proceedings and the international proceeding before the Inter-American protection system. These amounts shall be paid through the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. 10. Decide[d] that it shall supervise compliance with th[e] judgment and that it shall close the case only after such compliance. 4. On May 11, June 6, June 27 and September 3, 2001, and on February 20 and May 10, 2002, the State presented various briefs1 concerning compliance with the judgment of February 2, 2001. 5. On November 15, 2001, and on February 1, 2002, the Inter-American Commission forwarded briefs2 concerning compliance with the judgment of February 2, 2001. 6. The victims and their legal representatives presented various communications on compliance with the judgment of February 2, 2001, on the following dates3: June 4, 5, 14, 18 and 21, 2001; July 30, 2001; August 14, 2001; October 19, 2001; January 11, 15 and 18, 2002; February 1, 2002; March 12, 21 and 25, 2002; April 12, 2002; May 3, 2002; and June 3, 13 and 19, 2002. 7. On May 14 and 15, 2001, and on April 12, 2002, the Panamanian Ombudsman forwarded communications4, in which he referred to compliance with the judgment of February 2, 2001. 8. On the morning of February 25, 2002, a meeting was held at the seat of the Court5, attended by the President and the Vice President of the Court (hereinafter “the President” and “the Vice President”), two officials of the Secretariat of the Court (hereinafter “the Secretariat”), and six representatives of the State. 9. On the afternoon of February 25, 2002, a meeting was held at the seat of the Court6, attended by the President and the Vice President of the Court, two Secretariat officials, two representatives of the Center for Justice and International 1 Cf. Baena Ricardo et al. case. Compliance with judgment. Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of June 21, 2002, having seen paragraphs 2, 10, 14, 23 and 33. 2 Cf. Baena Ricardo et al. case. Compliance with judgment. Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of June 21, 2002, having seen paragraphs 18 and 21. 3 Cf. Baena Ricardo et al. case. Compliance with judgment. Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of June 21, 2002, having seen paragraphs 5-9, 12, 13, 19, 20, 22, 27-30, 32 and 34-36. 4 Cf. Baena Ricardo et al. case. Human Rights of June 21, 2002, having 5 Cf. Baena Ricardo et al. case. Human Rights of June 21, 2002, having Compliance with judgment. Order of the Inter-American Court of seen paragraphs 3 and 31. Compliance with judgment. Order of the Inter-American Court of seen paragraph 24. 6 Cf. Baena Ricardo et al. case. Compliance with judgment. Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of June 21, 2002, having seen paragraph 25.