2 5. To call upon the State and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights to take the necessary steps to create an appropriate mechanism to coordinate and monitor the aforementioned measures by March 21, 2003, at the latest. 6. To call upon the State to report to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights on the measures that it has adopted in compliance with [the] Order by February 28, 2003, at the latest. 7. To call on the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights to present to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights any comments that it deem[ed] appropriate within one week of notification of the State’s report. 8. To call upon the State, following its communication of February 28, 2003 (supra fifth operative paragraph), to continue informing the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, every two months, on the provisional measures adopted and to call upon the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights to present its comments on these reports within six weeks of receiving them. […] 3. The November 21, 2003 Order of the Court, in which it decided, inter alia: […] 2. To reiterate the order to the State to adopt, forthwith, such measures as may be necessary to protect the lives and the right to humane treatment of Luisiana Ríos, Armando Amaya, Antonio José Monroy, Laura Castellanos and Argenis Uribe. 3. To order the State to adopt and maintain such measures as may be necessary to protect the life, the right to humane treatment and freedom of expression of Carlos Colmenares, Noé Pernía and Pedro Nikken, employees of the television broadcast station Radio Caracas Televisión (RCTV). 4. To order the State to allow participation of the beneficiaries in planning and implementation of the protection measures and, in general, to inform them of progress regarding the measures ordered. 5. To order the State to investigate the facts stated in the complaint that gave rise to the [...] measures, with the aim of discovering and punishing those responsible. 6. To order the State to report to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights on the measures it has taken to comply with the [...] Order, no later than November 28, 2003. 7. To order the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights to submit whatever comments it deem[ed] pertinent on the report by the State, within two weeks of being notified thereof by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. 8. To order the State, subsequent to its first report (supra operative paragraph six), to continue reporting to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, every two months, on the Provisional Measures adopted, and to order the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights to submit its observations on said reports within six weeks of being notified thereof by the Court. […] 4. The December 2, 2003 Order of the Court, in which it decided: 1. To reiterate that the State has not implemented effectively the different provisional measures ordered by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the [...] case. 2. To declare that the State has failed to comply with the obligation imposed on it by Article 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights.