ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF FEBRUARY 22, 2011 PROVISIONAL MEASURES WITH REGARD TO HAITI MATTER OF A.J. ET AL.* HAVING SEEN: 1. The Order of the then President of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Inter-American Court” or “the Court”) of August 24, 2009 (hereinafter “the Order of the President” or “Order for urgent measures”), in which she required the State to adopt, forthwith, all necessary measures to protect the life and personal integrity of A. J., J. L., Sterlin Joudain, Michelet Laguerre, Pierre Luc Sael and André Junior Laurore. 2. The Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of September 21, 2009 (hereinafter “the Order on provisional measures), which ratified the Order of the President of the Court. It also expanded the provisional measures to protect the life and personal integrity of the next of kin of the beneficiaries Sterlin Joudain, Michelet Laguerre, Pierre Luc Sael and André Junior Laurore. However, the Court admitted this expansion of the measures to the said next of kin on a provisional basis, while awaiting further information on the individual situation, the existence, the nature, and the origin or source of risk. 3. The brief of October 6, 2009, in which the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (hereinafter “the Inter-American Commission” or “the Commission”) advised, inter alia, of the decease of S. J., a relative of one of the beneficiaries, on September 28, 2009; before he died, he had indicated “that the men who beat him rebuked him for having sought help [...] in the case of the rape” of his relative. However, no request was made to expand the measures to other members of the family based on this fact. 4. The communication of October 16, 2009, whereby the Secretariat of the Court (hereinafter “the Secretariat”), on the instructions of the then President of the Court, reminded the State that the deadline for forwarding its report had expired on October 14, 2009, without the Secretariat of the Court having received the report. It asked the State to forward it as soon as possible. * In the Order of August 24, 2009, the President of the Court considered it appropriate not to publish the identity of two of the beneficiaries of the urgent measures ordered, owing to the nature of the alleged violations reported and considering the age of one of them at the time of the facts. However, the State was informed of their names, confidentially, so that it could offer them the protection required in the Order. Furthermore, the President asked the representatives and the Commission for their opinion on the need to maintain the identity of these two individuals in any future decisions of the Court. The Inter-American Commission responded that “the confidentiality of their identity should be maintained as required by the President in her Order of August 24, 2009.”

Select target paragraph3