CEJIL

- Library
- Sign in

I/A Court HR. Case of Baraona Bray v. Chile. Preliminary objections, merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of November 24, 2022. Ricardo C. Pérez Manrique President Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot Nancy Hernández López Verónica Gómez Rodrigo Mudrovitsch Romina I. Sijniensky Deputy Registrar So ordered, Ricardo C. Pérez Manrique President Romina I. Sijniensky Deputy Registrar 56

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

Uwazi is developed by
CEJIL
Library
Login

Info
15Relationships

Search Tips

Search text

Type something in the search box to get some results.

I INTRODUCTION TO THE CASE AND CAUSE OF THE ACTION4
II PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COURT5
III JURISDICTION6
IV PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS6
A. Control of the legality of the Commission’s submission of the case6
B. Objection of fourth instance9
V PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS10
VI EVIDENCE12
A. Admission of documentary evidence12
B. Admissibility of the testimonial and expert evidence13
VII FACTS13
A. Regulatory framework13
B. The logging of alerce trees in Chile15
C. Regarding Carlos Baraona Bray16
D. Statements made by Carlos Baraona Bray to several media outlets17
VIII MERITS22
VIII-1 THE ALLEGED STATUS OF CARLOS BARAONA BRAY AS AN ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENDER23
A. Arguments of the Commission and the parties23
B. Considerations of the Court23
VIII-2 FREEDOM OF THOUGHT AND EXPRESSION, IN RELATION TO THE OBLIGATION TO RESPECT RIGHTS AND THE DUTY TO ADOPT PROVISIONS OF DOMESTIC LAW ESTABLISHED IN THE CONVENTION 9726
A. Arguments of the Commission and the parties26
VIII- 3 LACK OF LEGALITY IN THE RESTRICTIONS IMPOSED ON FREEDOM OFTHOUGHT AND EXPRESSION, IN RELATION TO THE OBLIGATION TORESPECT THE RIGHTS ESTABLISHED IN THE CONVENTION40
A. Arguments of the Commission and the parties40
B. Considerations of the Court41
VIII- 4 RIGHT TO JUDICIAL PROTECTION IN RELATION TO THE OBLIGATION TORESPECT RIGHTS42
A. Arguments of the Commission and the parties42
B. Considerations of the Court43
IX REPARATIONS45
A. Injured party47
B. Measures of restitution47
C. Measures of satisfaction48
D. Guarantees of non-repetition49
E. Other measures requested51
F. Compensation51
G. Costs and expenses52
H. Method of compliance with the payments ordered53
X OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS53
VOTE OF JUDGES PEREZ MANRIQUE, FERRER MAC GREGOR AND MUDROVITSCH57
VOTE JUDGES SIERRA PORTO AND HERNÁNDEZ LÓPEZ79

Baraona Bray. Judgment. November 24, 2022

IACourt judgment

Preview

Type

Costs
Merits
Preliminary Objections
Reparations

Date: Nov 24, 2022

Mechanism

Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos

Number: C 481

Country

Chile

Signatories

Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot
Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto
Nancy Hernández López
Ricardo C. Pérez Manrique
Rodrigo de Bittencourt Mudrovitsch
Verónica Gómez

Separate vote

Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot
Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto
Nancy Hernández López
Ricardo C. Pérez Manrique
Rodrigo de Bittencourt Mudrovitsch

Primary Documents

Baraona Bray. Judgment. November 24, 2022.pdf
English
ML TOC
Download View
Baraona Bray. Sentencia de 24 de noviembre de 2022.pdf
Spanish
Download View

Supporting files

Baraona Bray. Judgment. November 24, 2022.docx628.73 kB

Baraona Bray. Sentencia de 24 de noviembre de 2022.docx642.78 kB

No References

References are parts of this document related with other documents and entities.

País1
- Country1
Separate Votes2
- Separate vote2
Mecanismo1
- Mechanism1
Signatories6
- Judge and/or Commissioners6
Signatory Separate Vote5
- Judge and/or Commissioners5

Create Reference

Select relationship type

Relacionado a
CorteIDH
CIDH
Votos separados
Paises
Jueces intervinientes
País
Multi Select
Mecanismo
Firmantes
Sexo
Tipo
Firmante Voto separado
Estado
Descriptores
Geolocalización de los hechos del caso
Medidas de Protección

Search Tips

Notifications

You're all caught up

New activity will show up here.