23 persons, provisional measures become a true jurisdictional guarantee that is preventive in nature.34 * * 75. The representative alluded to a situation of extreme gravity derived from the order of detention that the victim received. According to the representative, “[t]he situation is aggravated taken into account that [Mrs.] De La Cruz[…] could not access any penitentiary benefit to be able to obtain her request for release, having eliminated any type of penitentiary benefit to the persons condemned for the crime of terrorism, that would be her case, through Law No. 29423, the Law that derogates the Legislative Decree No. 927 that regulates the criminal execution of crimes of terrorism.” 76. The Commission “consider[ed] it worrisome […] that with a basis in a decision that at [its] criteria […] does not comply with the standards of the Inter-American Court […], can arrive at the detainment of the victim in this case.” 77. After analyzing the foundations that sustain this request for the adoption of provisional measures (supra Considering 76), it is shown that the object of the request of the representative is connected to the obligation imposed on the State in the first operative paragraph of the Judgment concerned, that is, “to observe the principle of legality and of ex post facto laws consecrated in Article 9 of the American Convention and the demands of legal due process in the new process that follows for Mrs. Maria Teresa De La Cruz Flores.” Consequently, the issue raised relates to the possible capture or detention of Mrs. De La Cruz Flores, regarding that it derives from an internal decision that does not comply with that ordered by the Tribunal in its Judgment (supra Considering 51) is directly related with the supervision of compliance with the same.35 THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, In the exercise of its powers of supervision of compliance with its decisions and in conformity with Articles 33, 62(1), 62(3), 65, 67 and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, Articles 25(1) and 30 of the Statute, and Articles 31(2) and 69 of its Rules, 34 Cf. Case of the Newspaper “La Nación”. Provisional Measures regarding Costa Rica. Order of the InterAmerican Court of Human Rights of September 7, 2001, Considering fourth; Matter of Alvarado Reyes et al. Provisional Measures regarding Mexico. Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of May 26, 2010, Considering fourth, and Matter of the Forensic Anthropology Association. Provisional Measures regarding Guatemala. Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of July 21, 2010, Considering fifth. 35 In a similar sense, see Raxcaco Reyes et al. Request for Amplification of Provisional Measures regarding Guatemala. Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of February 2, 2007, Considering twenty-first.