- 100 in relation to Article 1(1) of this instrument, or the obligation of non-refoulement established in Article 13(4) of the Inter-American Convention to Prevent and Punish Torture. Judge Vio Grossi dissenting. By three votes in favor and three against, and the deciding vote of the President, that: 3. The State is responsible for the violation of the guarantee of a reasonable time, established in Article 8(1) of the American Convention in relation to Article 1(1) thereof, to the detriment of Wong Ho Wing, in the terms of paragraphs 207 to 223. Judges F. Caldas, Pérez Pérez and Vio Grossi dissenting. By five votes to one, that: 4. The State is responsible for the violation of the right to personal liberty, recognized in Article 7(1), 7(3), 7(5) and 7(6) of the American Convention in relation to Article 1(1) thereof, to the detriment of Wong Ho Wing, in the terms of paragraphs 247 to 255, 267 to 275 and 279 to 292. Judge Vio Grossi dissenting. By five votes to one, that: 5. The State is not responsible for the violation of the right to be heard and of the right of defense, established in Article 8(1) of the American Convention, in relation to Article 1(1) thereof, to the detriment of Wong Ho Wing, in accordance with paragraphs 227 to 234. Judge Vio Grossi dissenting. By, that: 6. The State is not responsible for the violation of Article 7(2) of the Convention, in relation to Article 1(1) of this instrument, to the detriment of Wong Ho Wing, in the terms of paragraphs 259 to 262. Judges Pérez Pérez and Vio Grossi dissenting. By five votes to one, that: 7. The State is not responsible for the violation of the right to personal integrity, recognized in Article 5 of the American Convention, in relation to Article 1(1) of this instrument, to the detriment of Wong Ho Wing, in the terms of paragraphs 294 and 295. Judge Vio Grossi dissenting. By five votes to one, that: