- 101 8. It is not necessary to issue a ruling on the alleged failure to comply with the right to judicial protection recognized in Article 25 of the Convention in relation to the alleged failure to comply with the decision of the Constitutional Court, in the terms of paragraphs 193 to 206. Judge Vio Grossi dissenting. By four votes to two, that: 9. It is not necessary to issue a ruling on the alleged failure to comply with the obligation to adopt domestic legal provisions, recognized in Article 2 of the Convention, in relation to the arbitrary nature of the detention of Wong Ho Wing, in the terms of paragraph 256. Judges Pérez Pérez and Vio Grossi dissent. AND ESTABLISHES, By five votes to one, that: 10. This Judgment constitutes per se a form of reparation. Judge Vio Grossi dissenting. By five votes to one, that: 11. The State must take the final decision in the extradition process in the case of Wong Ho Wing as soon as possible, as established in paragraph 302. Judge Vio Grossi dissenting. By five votes to one, that: 12. The provisional measures ordered in this case are annulled, insofar as they are replaced by the measures of reparation ordered in this Judgment as of the date of its notification, as established in paragraph 303. Judge Vio Grossi dissenting. By four votes to two, that: 13. The State must immediately review the deprivation of liberty of Wong Ho Wing, as established in paragraph 305. Judges Pérez Pérez and Vio Grossi dissenting. By five votes to one, that: