CEJIL

- Libreria
- Registrarse

- 103 Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto President Roberto F. Caldas Manuel E. Ventura Robles Alberto Pérez Pérez Eduardo Vio Grossi Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Secretary So ordered, Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto President Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Secretary

Seleccionar párrafo de destino3

● ● ●

Uwazi es desarrollado por
CEJIL
Libreria
Acceder

Información
17relaciones

Consejos de búsqueda

Buscar texto

Type something in the search box to get some results.

Tabla de Contenidos

I INTRODUCTION OF THE CASE AND PURPOSE OF THE DISPUTE4
II PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COURT5
III JURISDICTION7
IV PRELIMINARY OBJECTION7
A. Arguments of the State and observations of the representative and of the Commission7
B. Considerations of the Court8
V PROVISIONAL MEASURES11
VI PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS12
A. The factual framework of the case12
A.1) Arguments of the State and observations of the representative and of the Commission12
A.2) Considerations of the Court12
VII EVIDENCE13
A. Documentary, testimonial and expert evidence13
B. Admission of the evidence13
B.1) Admission of the documentary evidence13
B.2) Admission of the testimonial and expert evidence16
C. Assessment of the evidence17
VIII PROVEN FACTS17
A. Extradition Treaty between China and Peru18
B. The extradition process in Peru18
C. The extradition process in the case of Wong Ho Wing19
C.1) First stage of the process (from the arrest of Wong Ho Wing until the second advisory decision)19
C.2) Second stage of the process (from the second advisory decision to date)24
C.3) Diplomatic assurances granted by the People’s Republic of China in relation to the extradition of Wong Ho Wing29
D. The detention of Wong Ho Wing and the remedies filed in this regard32
IX RIGHTS TO LIFE AND PERSONAL INTEGRITY AND PRINCIPLE OF NON-REFOULEMENT, IN RELATION TO THE OBLIGATION TO ENSURE RIGHTS36
A. Arguments of the parties and of the Commission37
B. Considerations of the Court39
B.1) General considerations on the obligation to ensure rights and the principle of non-refoulement in the face of possible risks to the rights to life, to personal integrity and to due process in extradition proceedings39
B.2) Nature of the international responsibility of the State in this case and information to be considered by the Court43
B.3) Alleged risk of application of the death penalty in this case45
B.4) Alleged risk of torture and other forms of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment49
B.5) General conclusion on the alleged risk of violation of the rights to life and personal integrity of Wong Ho Wing if he is extradited61
X RIGHTSTO JUDICIAL PROTECTION AND JUDICIAL GUARANTEES, IN RELATION TO THE OBLIGATION TO RESPECT AND ENSURE RIGHTS61
A. Arguments of the parties and of the Commission62
B. Considerations of the Court63
B.1) The alleged violation of the right to judicial protection63
B.2) Reasonable time of the extradition process67
B.3) Other guarantees of due process (right to be heard and right to a defense)72
XI RIGHTS TO PERSONAL LIBERTY ANDPERSONAL INTEGRITY, IN RELATION TO THE OBLIGATION TO RESPECT AND ENSURE RIGHTS75
A. Arbitrary nature of the provisional arrest79
A.1) Arguments of the parties and of the Commission79
A.2) Considerations of the Court80
B. The alleged unlawful and arbitrary nature of the detention after the decision of the Constitutional Court83
B.1) Arguments of the parties and of the Commission83
B.2) Considerations of the Court83
C. The duration of the provisional arrest84
C.1) Arguments of the parties and of the Commission84
C.2) Considerations of the Court85
D. Right to appeal before a competent court87
D.1) Arguments of the parties and of the Commission87
D.2) Considerations of the Court88
E. Alleged violation of the right to personal integrity of Wong Ho Wing92
XII REPARATIONS92
A. Injured party93
B. Measures of integral reparation: restitution and satisfaction93
B.1) Restitution93
B.2) Satisfaction95
B.3) Other measures requested95
C. Compensation95
D. Costs and expenses97
E. Method of complying with the payments ordered98
XIII OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS99
SEPARATE DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE VIO GROSSI107

Wong Ho Wing. Sentencia de 30 de junio de 2015

Sentencia de la Corte IDH

Preview

Tipo

Costas
Excepciones Preliminares
Fondo
Reparaciones

Fecha: 30 jun 2015

Mecanismo

Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos

País

Perú

Firmantes

Alberto Pérez Pérez
Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot
Eduardo Vio Grossi
Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto
Manuel E. Ventura Robles
Roberto de Figueiredo Caldas

Votos separados

Alberto Pérez Pérez
Eduardo Vio Grossi

Documentos primarios

Wong Ho Wing. Excepciones Preliminares, Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas. Sentencia de 30 de junio de 2015.pdf
Spanish
Descargar Ver
Wong Ho Wing. Preliminary Objection, Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment. June 30, 2015.pdf
English
Descargar Ver

Archivos de soporte

Wong Ho Wing. Sentencia de 20 de junio de 2015.docx390.21 kB

Sin referencias

References are parts of this document related with other documents and entities.

Firmante Voto separado1
- Juez/a y/o Comisionado/a1
País1
- País1
Firmantes5
- Juez/a y/o Comisionado/a5
Mecanismo1
- Organismo1
Votos separados2
- Voto Separado2
No existe etiqueta1
- Causa1
Documentos de la CorteIDH6
- Resolución de Presidencia de la CorteIDH1
- Sentencia de la Corte IDH1
- Resolución de la Corte IDH3
- Audiencia1

Crear Referencia

Seleccionar tipo de relación

Relacionado a
CorteIDH
CIDH
Votos separados
Paises
Jueces intervinientes
País
Multi Select
Mecanismo
Firmantes
Sexo
Tipo
Firmante Voto separado
Estado
Descriptores
Geolocalización de los hechos del caso
Medidas de Protección

Consejos de búsqueda

Notificaciones

Estás al día

La actividad nueva se mostrará aquí.