order to verify the personal data of the presumed victims in this case. Accordingly, it incorporates them under Article 58(a) of the Rules of Procedure, because it considers them useful and will assess them together with the body of evidence and as pertinent for this case. 47. During the public hearing (supra para. 9), the State presented supreme final judgment R.N. No. 1071-2012 issued by the Transitory Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic on April 17, 2013, in the context of the criminal proceeding based on the facts of this case, and a copy of this was handed to the representatives and to the Commission. Considering that it is useful in order to decide this case, and in the terms of Article 57(2) of the Rules of Procedure, the Court admits this probative element provided by the State because it refers to facts that occurred after the presentation of the answering brief. In addition, during the hearing, the representatives presented parts of the report of the Permanent Historical Commission of the Peruvian Army entitled “En Honor a la Verdad,” published in Lima in 2010, as grounds for its objection to the opinion given by Mr. Abad Agurto, and a copy was provided to the State and to the Commission. The Court will consider any relevant information it contains in order to take a decision on this request by the representatives (infra para. 52). 48. With regard to the documents provided by the State 51 and the representatives 52 with their final written arguments, the Court incorporates them as they refer to events that took place after the presentation of the motions and arguments brief and of the answering brief that are relevant for deciding this case. Regarding Note No. 1323-2013-FSPNC-MP-FN of September 25, 2013, presented by the State without any justification as to why it was transmitted after the answering brief, the Court find that this document is time-barred because it refers to general information relating to the work of the Prosecutor General’s Office over several years, “promoting the investigation and prosecution of cases of human rights violations”; hence the Court will not consider it in its decision. 49. With regard to the documents on costs and expenses sent by the representatives with their final written arguments, 53 the Court will only consider those that refer to new costs and expenses they incurred as a result of the proceedings before this Court; in other words, those incurred after the presentation of the motions and arguments brief. B.2. Admission of the testimony and the expert opinions 50. The Court finds it pertinent to admit the testimony and expert opinions provided during the public hearing and by affidavit that are in keeping with the purpose defined by the acting President Elena Máxima Osorio Rivera; 10) National identity card of Porfirio Osorio Rivera; 11) Birth certificate of Elena Máxima Osorio Rivera; 12) Birth certificate of Adelaida Osorio Rivera, and 13) Birth certificate of Mario Osorio Rivera. 51 Annex 1: Note No. 221-2013-DDHH-PJ of September 11, 2013, of the Principal Representative of the Judiciary before the National Human Rights Council, attaching supreme final judgment R.N. No. 1071-2012 issued by the Transitory Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic on April 17, 2013, in criminal proceedings File No. 10712012; Annex 2: Note No. 172-2013-DDHH/PJ of July 12, 2013, of the Principal Representative of the Judiciary before the National Human Rights Council regarding the execution of the said final judgment and consultation of supreme judicial files of July 11 and September 26, 2013, and Annex 3: Note No. 1323-2013-FSPNC-MP-FN of September 25, 2013, of the Coordinator of the National Superior Criminal Prosecution Service and the Supraprovincial Criminal Prosecution Services, related to information concerning the work of the Prosecutor General’s Office “promoting the investigation and prosecution of cases of human rights violations.” 52 Annex 1: The Judiciary’s Office for Judicial Supervision, decision of August 21, 2013, and Annex 2: Ombudsman’s Office, Report No. 162, “A diez años de verdad, justicia y reparación. Avances, retrocesos y desafíos de un proceso inconcluso” [After 10 years of truth, justice and reparation: progress, setbacks and challenges of a process that has not yet concluded], 2013. 53 Annex 3: Table of expenses, hearing, August 29, and supporting documentation. 19