250. The Court will determine measures to make reparation for the non-pecuniary damage that are not of a monetary nature, and will establish measures of public scope and repercussion.293 International case law and, in particular, that of the Court, has established repeatedly that the judgment constitutes per se a form of reparation.294 Nevertheless, considering the circumstances of the case sub judice, based on the harm to the victims, as well as the consequences of a non-material and non-pecuniary nature resulting from the violation of the Convention declared to their detriment, the Court finds it pertinent to establish measures of satisfaction and restitution, and guarantees of non-repetition. B. Measures of satisfaction and restitution, and guarantees of non-repetition 1. Measures of satisfaction: publication of the Judgment Arguments of the Commission and of the parties 251. The Commission asked the Court to order the State “[t]o acknowledge publicly, ensuring adequate dissemination mechanisms, the violations declared in this case; in particular, the violation of judicial independence.” 252. The representatives indicated that the State must “acknowledge publicly its international responsibility by publishing the main paragraphs of the judgment on merits handed down in the main national media with the most widespread local circulation. That is, in […] Guayaquil [and in] Quito.” They also asked that “the judgment be published in the official gazette. Lastly, “the entire judgment must be available on the official websites of the Judiciary, the Attorney General’s office, and the Constitutional Court”. 253. The State indicated that “should the Court find against it, […] as a measure of satisfaction, it will publish the judgment in a national newspaper, and also in the official gazette,” and that the Judgment “will also be made available on the websites of the Attorney General’s office, the Constitutional Court, and the Ministry of Justice, Human Rights and Worship.” Considerations of the Court 254. The Court orders the State to publish, within six months of notification of this Judgment: (a) the official summary of the Judgment prepared by the Court, once, in the official gazette of Ecuador; (b) the official summary of this Judgment prepared by the Court, once, in a national newspaper with widespread circulation, and (c) this Judgment in its entirety, available for one year, on an official website of the Judiciary. 2. Measures of restitution Arguments of the Commission and of the parties 255. The Commission requested that the State “[r]einstate the victims in the Judiciary, in positions similar to those they held, with the same remuneration, social benefits, and rank 293 Cf. Case of the “Street Children” (Villagrán Morales et al.) v. Guatemala. Reparations and costs. Judgment of May 26, 2001. Series C No. 77, para. 84, and Case of Artavia Murillo et al. ("In vitro fertilization") v. Costa Rica. Preliminary objections, merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of November 28, 2012. Series C No. 257, para. 323. 294 Cf. Case of Neira Alegría et al. v. Peru. Reparations and costs. Judgment of September 19, 1996. Series C No. 29, para. 56, and Case of Mendoza et al. v. Argentina, para. 355. 75