obligation relates. 38 Prompt observance of the State’s obligation to advise the Court about how it is complying with each element ordered by the Court is essential for the assessment of the status of compliance with the provisional measures as a whole. 39 THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, in exercise of the authority conferred on it by Articles 63(2) of the American Convention on Human Rights, and 27 and 31 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court, DECIDES: 1. To lift the provisional measures ordered by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in favor of Benjamín Cuéllar Martínez and Henry Paul Fino Solórzano on May 12, 2007. 2. To maintain, as pertinent, the provisional measures ordered by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in its Orders of May 12 and November 26, 2007, and February 2, 2010, in favor of Mr. Meléndez Quijano, Marina Elizabeth García de Meléndez, Andrea Elizabeth Meléndez García, Estefani Marcela Meléndez García, 40 Pamela Michelle Meléndez García, Adriana María Meléndez García, Gloria Tránsito Quijano widow de Meléndez, Sandra Ivette Meléndez Quijano, Roxana Jacqueline Mejía Torres, and Manuel Alejandro Meléndez Mejía, for an additional period that will expire on June 30, 2014, after which the Court will evaluate the pertinence of keeping them in force. 3. To require the State to present a detailed report on the actual situation of each of the beneficiaries named in the second operative paragraph of this Order, compared to the situation that gave rise to these provisional measures, by February 20, 2014, at the latest; the report should include the arguments and evidence that support its position as regards the lifting of these provisional measures, pursuant to considering paragraph 28 of this Order. 4. To require Adrián Meléndez Quijano, on behalf of himself and in representation of the other beneficiaries of these provisional measures, to present his observations on the State’s report within four weeks of receiving it, and to refer to the actual situation of each of the beneficiaries, individually, compared to the situation that gave rise to these provisional measures, pursuant to considering paragraph 28 of this Order, in which he includes the arguments and evidence based on which he considers that the measures ordered should be 38 Cf. Matter of Liliana Ortega et al. Provisional measures with regard to Venezuela. Order of the Court of December 2, 2003, twelfth considering paragraph, and Case of Eloisa Barrios et al., supra, sixtieth considering paragraph. 39 Cf. Case of the Five Pensioners v. Peru. Monitoring compliance with judgment. Order of the Court of November 17, 2004, fifth considering paragraph, and Case of Eloisa Barrios et al., supra, sixtieth considering paragraph. 40 On November 12, 2010, the representation of the beneficiaries indicated that “the name of one of the beneficiaries [of] the measures granted by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in its Order of March 23, 2007, was written incorrectly; specifically the [child] Estefani Mercedes Meléndez García; whereas the correct name is Estefani Marcela Meléndez García.” In this regard, on October 21, 2011, the Secretariat observed that “the name that appears in the said Order was the name included by the Inter-American Commission in the request for the provisional measures. However, based on the clarification presented by the representatives, on the instructions of the President, hereinafter the Court will refer to this beneficiary as Estefani Marcela Meléndez García.” 15