B. Obligation to provide Wilson García Asto and Urcesino Ramírez Rojas with the opportunity for training and professional development through study grants (twelfth operative paragraph of the judgment) Arguments of the parties and of the Commission 12. The State noted that on January 6, 2012, it had requested the Ministry of Education to provide information "about all measures adopted or underway, in order to comply with the reparations that were ordered and a response is pending” by the Ministry. In its latest report, the State declared that “it has been handling the specific requests of [Mr.] Wilson García Asto in the Education Sector[, and will thus] inform the Court once it has obtained documentation in this regard.” Regarding Mr. Ramírez Rojas, the State did not provide information. 13. The representatives noted with respect to Mr. García Asto that, although he has almost completed his professional studies in Systems Engineering, “in order to obtain his professional title as Systems Engineer, he must submit a certificate or proof of having passed a foreign language course in the general curriculum issued by the Language Center of the University of Callao – CIUNAC,” but this center refused to accept the request for exemption made by Mr. García Asto. They added that “in the last four years, the State did not carry out any procedures regarding the scholarship grant for Mr. Wilson García Asto that would allow him to finish his studies in Systems Engineering and obtain the title of Systems Engineer.” Moreover, the representatives reported that agents of the Office of Scholarships and Student Loans (OBEC for its acronym in Spanish) contacted Mr. García Asto to solve “issues in the education sector.” In this regard, the victim told them of his interest in taking a master's course in information technology and taking the foreign language course he needed. In response, he was informed that his request would be made to the competent authorities and that he would be contacted as soon as possible, which as reported by representatives, had not yet occurred at the time of the State’s last brief. 14. In its last brief, the representatives indicated that on January 24, 2013, Mr. García Asto provided a copy of his High school degree diploma with the Program Scholarships 18 and Projoven Program, so that he could be provided a list of scholarships for the English course needed to get his degree but, as reported, he has not been provided with this information. The representatives concluded that “the State has failed to grant Mr. García Asto the scholarship to improve upon his professional undergraduate training.” In regard to Mr. Urcesino Ramírez Rojas, the representatives reported that he has not received a response from the State regarding his requests through the Ministry of Education and that the State’s brief does not include information on that measure. 15. The Commission expressed concern at the lack of updated information from the State and said that “the recent approach regarding Mr. García Asto [...] has not been translated into concrete progress.” In its latest report, the Commission reiterated its concern over the lack of concrete progress on this matter pending compliance and believed that the State should provide detailed information on the measures it has taken for granting scholarships to victims as soon as possible. Considerations of the Court 5