6 plaque, which was presided over by the Public Prosecutor of the Republic and was honored by the attendance of the victims’ next-of-kin. The State provided a compact disc containing photographs and a video of the ceremony. Colombia requested the Court to declare compliance with this reparation measure. 17. The representatives noted that this measure was fulfilled in good faith by the State, as the State unveiled a new plaque at the Office of the Public Prosecutor —the text and location of which were previously agreed upon with the victims' next-of-kin. They requested the Court to declare that the State’s compliance with this reparation measure. 18. The Commission took note of the information presented by the State and the representatives and the fact that the representatives requested the Court to declare compliance with this measure. 19. In accordance with information provided by the parties, the Tribunal considers that the State has fully complied with this reparation measure and emphasizes that it fulfilled the measure while constantly seeking mutual agreement with the representatives of the victims and their next-of-kin. To report, in a judicial branch television program, on the events of the case, the State’s partial recognition of responsibility, and the Judgment. 20. Regarding the obligation by which the judicial branch television program shall report on the events of the case, the State’s partial recognition of responsibility, and the Judgment (paragraph 277(I)(4) of the Judgment), none of the parties forwarded information on this measure. Therefore, the Court deems it necessary for the State to present detailed information on the matter, and for the representatives and the Commission to present their observations on the information provided by the State. To set up a diploma in Human Rights that include a study of this case 21. In relation to the measure to set up, for one time only, a diploma in Human Rights at the Escuela Superior de Administración Pública [Higher Education School of Public Administration ] (ESAP), which will include a study of this case (paragraph 277(I)(5) of the Judgment), the State informed that in a meeting held in June 2008, said Higher Education School presented the curriculum of the diploma to be taught and the representatives expressed their approval of its design and structure. In a report of April 14, 2009, it stated that said Higher Education School is following procedures to begin to offer the diploma course. 22. In a brief of May 22, 2009, the representatives noted that “some steps have been taken in order to implement this reparation measure,” but that it has not been fulfilled as of yet. 23. The Commission indicated that “it note[d] with satisfaction” the information presented by the State on the execution of activities to honor the commitments made, as well as the observations made by representatives that confirm the progress made to that end “and [that] it [was] waiting for information on the effective and full implementation of all the aspects of the reparation". 24. The Court values that, according to the information provided by the parties, the State has taken steps to make progress towards compliance with this measure.