214. Order 001-2011-P-CSJL/PJ established judicial appointments for judicial year 2011. Judge Ramiro Salinas Siccha was assigned as president of the Third Special Criminal Chamber, replacing Judge Iván Sequerios Vargas. Thus, the chamber was now made up of superior judges Ramiro Salinas Siccha, Manuel Alejandro Carranza Paniagua and Sonia Liliana Téllez Portugal.268 215. The trial was interrupted again on May 20, 2011 during the criminal proceedings. Judge Téllez Portugal had applied for sick leave and, with this change to the panel, the laws in effect held that the trial should be suspended but that “documentary and expert evidence should remain current, as well as evidence difficult to replicate that had been under examination in the trial.”269 216. The executive council of the judiciary ordered on May 25, 2011 that the Third Special Criminal Chamber of the Superior Court of Lima should take exclusive responsibility for the criminal trial of the “Chavín de Huántar” case and two other processes. 270 217. The entire membership of the Third Special Criminal Chamber changed on May 16, 2011.271 The chamber, now made up of superior judges Carmen Liliana Rojjasi Pella, Carolina Lizárraga Houghton and Adolfo Fernando Farfán Calderón, issued an order on May 20, 2011, that the final criminal trial should begin on June 1, 2011. 272 218. The debate finalized on October 5, 2012, following 109 sessions. 273 219. The Third Special Criminal Chamber of the Superior Court of Lima decided on October 15, 2012 to acquit Nicolás de Bari Hermoza Ríos, Vladimiro Montesinos Torres and Roberto Edmundo Huamán Ascurra of the charges against them for criminal instigation of the crime of murder of Herma Luz Meléndez Cueva, Víctor Salomón Peceros Pedraza and Eduardo Nicolás Cruz Sánchez. The court also decided to withhold judgment of fugitive defendant Jesús Salvador Zamudio Aliaga, until he had been apprehended, and orders were given nationwide to find him immediately and arrest him, and also to prevent him from leaving the country. His case was therefore set aside provisionally. 274 220. The Third Special Criminal Chamber of the Superior Court of Lima ruled on whether an order had been issued to kill the MRTA members indiscriminately. Specifically, the Court found: Cf. Ruling by the Third Special Criminal Chamber of the Superior Court of Lima, October 15, 2012 (evidence file, volume XX, annexed to the representatives’ observations on the State’s preliminary objections, folio 13181). 268 Order by the Third Special Criminal Chamber, May 20, 2011 (evidence file, volume VIII, annex 13 to the brief of pleadings, motions and evidence, folios 5557 to 5559). 269 Cf. Administrative order 146-2011-CE-PJ by the executive board of the judiciary, May 25, 2011 (case file before the Commission, volume V, folio 4091). 270 Cf. Ruling by the Third Special Criminal Chamber of the Superior Court of Lima, October 15, 2012 (evidence file, volume XX, annexed to the representatives’ observations on the State’s preliminary objections, folio 13182). 271 Cf. Order by the Third Special Criminal Chamber, May 20, 2011 (evidence file, volume VIII, annex 13 to the brief of pleadings, motions and evidence, folios 5557 to 5559). 272 Cf. Ruling by the Transitory Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court on an appeal to vacate judgment, 3521-2012 July 24, 2013 (evidence file, volume XXI, helpful evidence, folio 14672). 273 Cf. Ruling by the Third Special Criminal Chamber of the Superior Court of Lima, October 15, 2012 (evidence file, volume XX, annexed to the representatives’ observations on the State’s preliminary objections, folios 13177 to 13692). 274