6 received USD 138.32 (one hundred and thirty eight dollars and thirty two cents of the United States of America) and each partner received USD 1.062,42 (one thousand, sixty two dollars and forty two cents of the United States of America).” Finally, it was stated that, “[t]he money was credited to the account of each victim on May 14, 2010.” 14. The State also manifested that “due to an error that occurred during the transfer, the money owed to Mrs. Mariela Caicedo and her representatives (Marjuri Narcisa Caicedo and Gardenia Marianela Caicedo) could not be credited,” but the transfer would be ready by the end of July 2010, and apologized for the delay. Afterwards, the State informed that it had paid the compensation to Mrs. Caicedo Rodríguez. 15. The representatives thanked the State for the moratorium interest payment made to some of the beneficiaries and indicated that they awaited the payment to the remaining beneficiaries. 16. The Commission expressed that it values the agreement reached between the victims and the State in order to fulfill the payment of the pending moratorium interest. 17. The Court positively values the agreement to pay moratorium interest reached between the State and the beneficiaries of pecuniary compensation. In light of the agreement between representatives and the State, and the understanding that the latter shall fully comply with the agreement regarding one of the persons that had not received the payment, the State shall inform and demonstrate, by means of the relevant documents, full compliance of the payment of moratorium interest owed. THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, in exercising its power to monitor compliance with its decisions, pursuant to Articles 67 and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, Article 30 of the Statute, and Articles 31(2) and 69 of its Rules of Procedure, DECLARES: 1. That according to that provided for in the considering clause 17 of the present Order, the State has partially complied with the obligation to directly pay the next of kin of Messrs. Wilmer Zambrano Vélez, Segundo Olmedo Caicedo Cobeña and José Miguel Caicedo Cobeña, the accrued moratorium interest, owed as compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages (operative paragraph eleven of the Judgment of July 4, 2007) and to prove the respective interest payments to those still waiting to receive it. 2. That in accordance with that provided for in Considering Clauses 9, 10 and 11 of the present Order, the procedure to monitor compliance with the outstanding