301. The Court recalls that if national mechanisms exist to determine forms of reparation, these procedures and their results should be evaluated 315 to ensure that they meet standards of objectivity, reasonableness, and effectiveness for adequately redressing the rights violations declared by the Court. 316 In this regard, the Court takes a positive view of efforts already undertaken by the Argentine State to fulfill its duty to provide reparations to the victims of the serious events that occurred during the period 1976-1983. These efforts are reflected in the benefits provided, including through Laws 24,411, 25,914, and 26,913. Likewise, the Court recalls that the administrative procedures were initiated to obtain the due benefits for the victims of this case, which, to date, have not resulted in the payment of specific compensation 317 (supra paras. 115 to 117). 302. Thus, given the current status of these procedures, the Court deems it pertinent to take into account the amounts proposed by the State for pecuniary damages and specifically under the headings discussed herein. In this regard, Argentina, in its answering brief, presented a breakdown of the sums that stand to be awarded to the victims as benefits provided for under Laws 24,411 and 25,914. 318 Specifically, Anatole and Victoria “will have access to an estimated lump sum […] equivalent to USD 491,506.00 (four hundred ninety-one thousand five hundred two dollars of the United States of America).” 319 303. This Court finds that the amount indicated is reasonable, in view of the violations declared in this Judgment and its awards in previous cases involving the facts similar to those at issue here. Therefore, with regard to the reparations related to loss of future earnings corresponding to Julien Cáceres and Ms. Grisonas Andrijauskaite, the State must pay both victims, Anatole Alejandro Larrabeiti Yáñez and Claudia Victoria Larrabeiti Yáñez, the aforementioned sum of USD 491,502.00 (four hundred ninety-one thousand five hundred two dollars of the United States of America), divided into equal parts to be disbursed within one year from the notification of this Judgment. For this purpose, if considered pertinent and as long as the amount, term and other established conditions are met (infra paras. 323 to 326), the State may make the payment through the administrative mechanism that have been implemented for reparations. 304. Because they do not meet the criteria defined in its case law on pecuniary damages, the Court does not accept the claims of the representative regarding the “substitute reparation for harm […] consisting of the loss of life” of the parents of Anatole and Victoria, nor the claims regarding loss of future earnings that it argued impacted the victims. Likewise, given that this Cf. Case of Cepeda Vargas v. Colombia. Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations, and Costs. Judgment dated May 26, 2010. Series C No. 213, par. 246; and Case of Almeida v. Argentina, supra, para. 48. 316 Cf. Case of Cepeda Vargas v. Colombia, supra, par. 246, Case of Vereda La Esperanza v. Colombia, supra, par. 303. 317 Cf. Statement by Anatole Alejandro Larrabeiti Yáñez, given at a public hearing before this Court. 318 Although in its final written arguments, Argentina made reference to the “impact [of] the pandemic” on the economy, alluding to an “approximation” of the amounts that would be granted, on this later occasion it did not specify the amounts nor did it present a detailed breakdown, so the Court takes into account, for the pertinent purposes, the amounts identified in the answering brief. 319 The State indicated that, pursuant to the aforementioned reparatory laws, the benefits amount to the following sums, expressed in the currency of the Argentine Republic: a) for detention, individually, ARS 1,965,247.60 (one million nine hundred sixty-five thousand, two hundred forty-seven pesos and sixty cents; (b) for replacement of identity, individually, ARS 6,255,516.00 (six million two hundred fifty-five thousand five hundred sixteen pesos; (c) for having suffered extremely serious injuries, individually, ARS 3,930,495.20 (three million nine hundred thirty thousand four hundred ninety-five pesos and twenty cents), and if such injuries are classified as serious, individually, ARS 2,947,871.40 (two million nine hundred forty-five seven thousand eight hundred seventy-one pesos and forty cents), and (d) for the forced disappearance of Victoria Lucía Grisonas Andrijauskaite and Mario Roger Julien Cáceres, for each one, ARS 6,255,516.00 (six million two hundred fifty-five thousand five hundred sixteen pesos). For the purposes of its equivalent in dollars of the United States of America, the State indicated that it had applied the “retailer-seller exchange rate” of “ARS 74.90,” according to information from the Central Bank of the Argentine Republic as of July 13, 2020. 315 75