2 4. The brief of the Inter-American Commission of April 16, 2003, indicating that the State had not adopted any measure to protect the life and personal integrity of Mr. Fleury since the President’s order on urgent measures. 5. The communication of the State of April 24, 2003, received by the Secretariat on May 20, 2003, acknowledging the Secretariat’s note of April 3, 2003 (supra having seen paragraph 3) and indicating that the note had been forwarded to the Ministry of Justice and Public Security “for the pertinent effects.” 6. The note of the Secretariat of May 22, 2003, asking the State to forward its communications “via fax or by courier, to ensure that they [were] received opportunely, so that the instant matter could be processed more promptly and efficiently.” 7. The communication of May 22, 2003, in which the Commission forwarded to the Court a note of March 21, 2003, received by the Secretariat of the Commission on May 6, 2003, in which the State referred to the precautionary measures ordered by the Commission. In addition, the Commission reiterated the observations contained in its communication of April 16, 2003 (supra having seen paragraph 4). 8. The Commission’s brief of May 30, 2003, in which it referred to the two letters presented by the State (supra having seen paragraph 5) and indicated that they did not constitute “a report to the Court […] concerning any urgent measures adopted by [the State].” The Commission also advised that Mr. Fleury’s situation had not changed and “that he continued to lived undercover and not in his home.” Lastly, the Commission asked the Court to declare that the State had failed to comply with its obligation to implement effectively the order of the President of the Court, to ratify this order, and to order the State to inform the Court, as soon as possible, about the specific and effective measures that it would adopt. 9. The order of the Court of June 7, 2003, in which it decided: 1. To ratify all aspects of the order of the President of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of March 18, 2003. 2. To declare that the State had not implemented effectively the urgent measures ordered by the President of the Inter-American Court in his order of March 18, 2003. 3. To require the State to adopt, forthwith, all necessary measures to protect the life and personal integrity of Lysias Fleury. 4. To require the State to investigate the facts that gave rise to the adoption of the provisional measures, in order to identify those responsible and impose the corresponding sanctions. 5. To require the State to allow the beneficiary of the measures to participate in their planning and implementation and, in general, to keep him informed about progress in the execution of the measures ordered by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. 6. To require the State to continue informing the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, every 30 days, about the provisional measures adopted, and to require the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights to present its observations on these reports of the State within two weeks of their notification. 10. The order of the Court of December 2, 2003, in which it decided: 1. To reiterate that the State had not implemented effectively the provisional measures ordered by the Inter-American Court in the instant case.