8 23. Regarding the other operative paragraphs pending compliance (supra second having seen paragraph), during the hearing, the State presented updated information on: the progress in the investigations and the proceedings opened to determine and eventually punish the authors of the facts; the measures adopted to guarantee the conditions for the return to the districts of El Aro and La Granja; the State programs to provide socio-economic support to the displaced victims, even with regard to the decisions taken by the National Housing Fund (FONVIVIENDA) authorities to comply with the agreements reached between the State and the victims concerning the implementation of a housing program, and certain requirements for the public act of acknowledgement of international responsibility. 24. For their part, the representatives expressed their points of view and made proposals on the ways of complying with the above-mentioned State obligations. The Commission referred to some aspects of how it considered the facts should be investigated, and recognized and encouraged the spirit of cooperation between the State and the representatives for the remaining measures pending compliance. 25. The Court assesses positively the willingness of the State to dialogue and coordinate with the representatives in order to comply with the obligations established in the judgment that remain pending, even though it observes that there are discrepancies about the way in which they should be carried out. In accordance with the statements made during the hearing by the State and the representatives, as well as the willingness they expressed to reach agreement on the required coordination measures, the Court awaits specific, accurate and updated information in this regard. 26. While monitoring compliance with the pending aspects of this case, the Court assesses the usefulness of the respective hearing, which is reflected in the good will and spirit of cooperation that has been shown. The Court will consider the general status of compliance with the pending aspects of the judgment handed down in the instant case, when it has received the pertinent information. THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, in exercise of the powers of the Court to monitor compliance with its decisions, and in accordance with Articles 33 and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, Article 30 of the Court’s Statute, and Articles 31 and 69 of its Rules of Procedure, DECLARES THAT: 1. As indicated in the ninth and nineteenth considering paragraphs of this Order, the State has complied with the obligation to: a) Publish once, in the official gazette the chapter on the proven facts in the judgment, without the corresponding footnotes, and the operative paragraphs of the judgment (twenty-second operative paragraph of the judgment), and