6 9. The communication of March 16, 2010, whereby the Inter-American Commission indicated that: a) based on the reports presented by the State and the communications of the petitioners during the processing of the precautionary measures, it can be derived that “the State’s response does not address the gravity and urgency of the situation, as it does not indicate having adopted concrete measures to investigate and establish [the] whereabouts [of Mr. Almonte Herrera] and, therefore, has not produced the immediate results that are necessary in situations such as this one;” b) the petitioners expressed that they have not been able to agree on anything concrete with regards to the precautionary measures, “especially because the State intends to provide protection through members of the national police, who have repeatedly been identified […] as responsible for the disappearance o[f Mr. Almonte Herrera] and of the facts of the threats and harassment against them,” from which it is inferred that “they are currently not being protect[ed],” and c) it strongly reiterates that taking into consideration the characteristics of this case, without detriment to the design and implementation of protection measures that must be performed by the State in agreement with the potential beneficiaries, “it is necessary to take into account that the persons assigned for their protection should not have any relationship with the National Police.” 10. The Order of the President of the Court of March 24, 2010, (hereinafter “the President’s Order”), whereby he decided to: 1. Require the State to adopt forthwith all measures necessary to determine the whereabouts of Mr. Juan Almonte Herrera and to protect his life and personal integrity, […] 2. Require the State to adopt, without delay, the measures necessary to guarantee the life and personal integrity of Yuverky Almonte Herrera, Joel Almonte, Genaro Rincón and Francisco de León Herrera, […]. 3. Require the State to adopt the measures necessary to guarantee the life and personal integrity of Ms. Ana Josefa Montilla, if she decides to return to the Dominican Republic, […] 4. Require the State to allow the beneficiaries to participate in the planning and implementation of the protection measures, […] 5. Require the State to report to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, on April 12, 2010 at the latest, on that set forth in operative paragraphs one and two, and if applicable operative paragraph three of the […] Order. 6. Request the Inter-American Commission and the representatives of the beneficiaries to submit before the Inter-American Court, as of April 19, 2010, at the latest, their observations on the report mentioned in operative paragraph five of the […] Order. 7. Require the State, in addition, to continue reporting to the Inter-American Court every two months as of the date of notification of this […] Order, on the measures adopted in conformity with this decision. 8. Require the representatives of the beneficiaries and the Inter-American Commission to submit their observations within four and six weeks, respectively, of the date of notification of the State’s reports indicated in Operative paragraph seven.