195. Lastly, the Court notes that the representatives forwarded vouchers related to the expenses paid to attend the public hearing held before this Court. Consequently, the Court orders the State to reimburse the victims’ representatives the sum of US$4,407.65 (four thousand four hundred and seven United States dollars and sixty-five cents), and to reimburse Nilda del Valle Maldonado the sum of US$5,262.56 (five thousand two hundred and sixty-two United States dollars and fifty-six cents). In addition, the Court orders, in equity, that the State reimburse the representatives the sum of US$25,000.00 (twenty-five thousand United States dollars) for their honorarium. The amounts established for the victims’ representatives must be delivered directly to the Centro de Estudios Legales and Sociales (CELS). At the stage of monitoring compliance with this Judgment, the Court may establish that the State reimburse the victims or their representatives any subsequent reasonable and duly authenticated expenses. 285 F. Other measures requested 196. The Commission asked the Court to order the State to determine the administrative, disciplinary, criminal or any other applicable type of responsibility for the flaws in the investigation and processing of the facts, and the obstructions that have led to impunity. In the Agreement signed with the representatives, the State undertook “to further the pending administrative and summary actions concerning the personnel of the Argentine Federal Police subject to its jurisdiction who may have taken part in the crime, concealed it, or obstructed the investigation.” 197. In addition, the representatives asked the Court to order the State: to legislate and regulate the full participation of victims and civil society organizations in administrative proceedings, and to implement an external control mechanism for the administrative proceedings; to incorporate into the “norms that govern the activities of the country’s law enforcement personnel a clause that establishes the possibility of filing and investigating, or reviewing, the disciplinary proceedings in relation to facts that have resulted in a recommendation, decision or conviction by an international monitoring and control organ in proceedings for human rights violations, in relation to the State”; to implement effective mechanisms for full compliance with the decisions of international organs concerning human rights; to amend the actual regulation of the institutional and corporate defense systems of law enforcement agencies; to create and implement mechanisms to protect officials willing to investigate; to create “a grant with the name of Jorge Omar Gutiérrez for police cadets to take courses on human rights”; to recall “the memory of Jorge Omar Gutiérrez during the ceremony of November 2 in which, each year, police agents who have died in the line of duty are commemorated”; to implement “the necessary measures to ensure that the place where the warehouse operated that adjoined the Avellaneda Second Police Precinct can be designated for a purpose that benefits the public,” and to support “the dissemination of the documentary that is being made on the facts of this case, as well as the re-edition of the book ‘Maten a Gutiérrez’ by Daniel Otero”. 198. In this regard, the Court finds that the measures of reparation ordered in this Judgment are sufficient based on the facts and human rights violations established. G. Method of complying with the payments ordered 199. The State must make the payments of compensation for pecuniary and nonpecuniary damage and to reimburse costs and expenses established in this Judgment 285 Cf. Case of Ibsen Cárdenas and Ibsen Peña, supra, para. 291, and Case of Luna López, supra, para. 260. 64