7 competent authorities (operative paragraph eight of the Judgment of February 6, 2001.) 2. That it will keep the monitoring compliance procedure open with regard to the operative paragraph pending compliance in the instant case: a) To investigate the facts that led to the violations set forth in the Judgment in order to identify and punish those responsible (operative paragraph seven of the Judgment of February 6, 2001); and, Decides: 1. To request the State to adopt all measures necessary to promptly and effectively comply with the operative paragraph pending compliance as set forth by the Court in the Judgments of February 6 and September 4, 2001, in accordance with the provisions of Article 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights. Therefore, the State must report, in an organized, detailed, complete, and up-to-date manner, on the steps taken and the progress made in each of the processes included in the instant case, emphasizing the causes of the objection and the application of prescription periods in three of the criminal procedures concerned, submitting, if necessary, the relevant parts of the corresponding files. 2. To request the State to submit to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, by December 6, 2010 at the latest, a report indicating all measures adopted to comply with the reparation ordered by this Court that is pending compliance, in compliance with Considering Clauses 10 to 15, as well as Declarative Paragraph two of the instant Order. 3. To request the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and the victim’s representatives to submit their observations on the State report mentioned in the previous operative paragraph, within six and four weeks, respectively, following receipt of said report. 4. To continue monitoring the operative paragraph pending compliance from the Judgments of February 6 and September 4, 2001. 5. To request the Secretariat of the Court to notify the State, the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights and the victim’s representatives of the instant Order.