CEJIL

- Libreria
- Registrarse

Alberto Pérez Pérez Eduardo Vio Grossi Roberto F. Caldas Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Secretary So ordered, Manuel E. Ventura Robles Acting President Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Secretary 127

Seleccionar párrafo de destino3

● ● ●

Uwazi es desarrollado por
CEJIL
Libreria
Acceder

Información
12relaciones

Consejos de búsqueda

Buscar texto

Type something in the search box to get some results.

Tabla de Contenidos

I INTRODUCTION OF THE CASE AND PURPOSE OF THE DISPUTE4
II PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COURT5
III PRELIMINARY OBJECTION 8
A)Arguments of the Commission and of the parties8
B)Considerations of the Court8
IV PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS9
A)On the determination of presumed victims in this case9
B)On the factual framework of this case 10
C)On the admissibility of certain arguments of the representative12
C.1 Admissibility of arguments during the public hearing and in the final written arguments12
C.2 Admissibility of certain parts in English of the final written arguments13
V COMPETENCE14
VI EVIDENCE14
A) Documentary, testimonial and expert evidence14
B) Admission of the evidence14
B.1 Admission of the documentary evidence14
B.2 Admission of the testimonial and expert evidence 17
VII FACTS 17
A)Context: “Political situation and public order in Peru at the time of the facts”18
B)The practice of detentions, torture and cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment at the time of the facts21
C)The counter-terrorism laws in force at the time of the facts22
D)Amendments to the counter-terrorism laws23
E)Proven facts in relation to Ms. J.24
E.1 Arrest of Ms. J. and searches25
E.2 Ms. J.’s detention from April 14 to 30, 1992 29
E.3 Criminal proceeding against Ms. J.30
E.4 Criminal procedure following the 2003 amendment of the counter-terrorism law34
E.5 The departure of Ms. J. from Peru and the extradition process36
E.6 Publications on the facts of the case in the media38
VIII RIGHTS TO PERSONAL LIBERTY, TO PROTECTION OF THE HOME, TO JUDICIAL GUARANTEES, AND PRINCIPLE OF LEGALITY IN RELATION TO THE OBLIGATION TO RESPECT AND GUARANTEE RIGHTS AND TO ADOPT DOMESTIC LEGAL PROVISIONS 38
A)Rights to personal liberty and to protection of the home 40
A.1 The initial arrest of the presumed victim, her presentation before a judge, and protection of the home43
A.1.1) Arguments of the Commission and of the parties 43
A.1.2) Considerations of the Court44
A.2 Notification of the reasons for the detention2
A.2.1) Arguments of the Commission and of the parties 48
A.2.2) Considerations of the Court48
A.3 The failure to register Ms. J.’s detention49
A.4 The preventive detention of the presumed victim between April 30, 1992, and June 18, 1993, as well as its relationship to the principle of the presumption of innocence49
A.4.1) Arguments of the Commission and of the parties 49
A.4.2) Considerations of the Court50
A.5The right to have recourse to a competent judge or court with regard to the legality of her detention 53
A.5.1) Arguments of the Commission and of the parties 53
A.5.2) Considerations of the Court54
B)Right to judicial guarantees and the principle of legality2
B.1 Alleged violations of due process in the first stage of the criminal proceedings against Ms. J. 56
B.1.1) Guarantees of competence, independence and impartiality of the judicial authorities who heard the case56
B.1.2) Right to defend oneself58
B.1.3) Right to a public proceeding64
B.1.4) The absence of reasoning and the presumption of innocence in the decision of the Supreme Court of Justice of December 27, 199366
B.2 Alleged violations of due process in the first and second stages of the criminal proceedings against Ms. J. 68
B.2.1) Right to the presumption of innocence68
B.2.2) Guarantee of non bis in idem75
B.3 Alleged violations of the principle of legality and of non-retroactivity81
B.3.1) Arguments of the Commission and of the parties 81
B.3.2) Considerations of the Court82
IX RIGHT TO PERSONAL INTEGRITY AND PRIVACYIN RELATION TO THE OBLIGATIONS TO RESPECT AND ENSURE THE RIGHTS87
A) General arguments of the Commission and of the parties87
B) General considerations of the Court88
C) Ill-treatment during the initial arrest 3
C.1) Arguments of the Commission and of the parties 90
C.2) Considerations of the Court91
C.2.1) The context at the time of the events 92
C.2.2) The statements by Ms. J.93
C.2.3) The forensic medicine examination3
C.2.4) The testimony of the prosecutor of the Public Prosecution Service 99
C.2.5) The failure to investigate the facts101
C.2.6) Determination of the ill-treatment that occurred 106
C.2.7) Legal characterization of the facts106
D) Alleged ill-treatment suffered during the detention in the DINCOTE109
D.1) Arguments of the Commission and of the parties 109
D.2) Considerations of the Court110
E) Other alleged violations of personal integrity113
X REPARATIONS (Application of Article 63(1) of the American Convention) 114
A)Injured party3
B)Obligation to investigate the facts that gave rise to the violations, and to identify, prosecute and punish those responsible, as appropriate115
C)Other measures of integral reparation: rehabilitation, satisfaction and guarantees of non-repetition 115
C.1) Rehabilitation116
C.2) Satisfaction: publication and dissemination of the Judgment117
C.3) Guarantees of non-repetition: request to adapt domestic law117
C.3.1) The legal restrictions that prevent offering as witnesses those who intervened in the elaboration of the police attestation118
D)Obligation to respect the guarantees of due process in the criminal proceedings opened against Ms. J.3
E)Compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage3
F)Costs and expenses121
G)Reimbursement of expenses to the Victim’s Legal Assistance Fund123
H)Method of complying with the payments ordered3
XI OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS124

J. Sentencia de 27 de noviembre de 2013

Sentencia de la Corte IDH

Preview

Tipo

Costas
Excepciones Preliminares
Fondo
Reparaciones

Fecha: 27 nov 2013

Mecanismo

Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos

Número: C-275

País

Perú

Firmantes

Alberto Pérez Pérez
Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot
Eduardo Vio Grossi
Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto
Manuel E. Ventura Robles
Roberto de Figueiredo Caldas

Documentos primarios

J. Excepciones Preliminares, Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas. Sentencia de 27 de noviembre de 2013.pdf
Spanish
Descargar Ver
J. Preliminary Objection, Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment. November 27, 2013.pdf
English
Descargar Ver

Archivos de soporte

J. Excepciones Preliminares, Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas. Sentencia de 27 de noviembre de 2013.doc1.16 MB

J. Preliminary Objection, Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment. November 27, 2013.doc988.67 kB

Sin referencias

References are parts of this document related with other documents and entities.

País1
- País1
Firmantes5
- Juez/a y/o Comisionado/a5
Mecanismo1
- Organismo1
No existe etiqueta1
- Causa1
Documentos de la CorteIDH4
- Resolución de Presidencia de la CorteIDH2
- Audiencia1
- Resolución de la Corte IDH1

Crear Referencia

Seleccionar tipo de relación

Relacionado a
CorteIDH
CIDH
Votos separados
Paises
Jueces intervinientes
País
Multi Select
Mecanismo
Firmantes
Sexo
Tipo
Firmante Voto separado
Estado
Descriptores
Geolocalización de los hechos del caso
Medidas de Protección

Consejos de búsqueda

Conectar a un párrafo

Connect to an entity

Disable highlights

Añadir a la tabla de contenidos

Notificaciones

Estás al día

La actividad nueva se mostrará aquí.