refers to the terms set forth thereof. Furthermore, the Court notes that as stated in paragraph 174 of its Judgment(supraViewed 1), in the sense that "[i] f the State fall into arrears, duty [would] pay interest on the amount owed to the bank interest on arrears in Paraguay," refers to the rate interest should be applied in the particular case, namely the rate in Paraguay, being that the criteria for compliance with the respective interest payment are those already mentioned in response to that query. Accordingly, the Court notes the will of the parties to achieve progress on this point based on an agreement and is waiting for updated information on efforts and results achieved regarding the compliance with this aspect of the reparation. 40. In monitoring compliance with the outstanding issues in this case, the Court assess the usefulness of the hearing held to this end, which has been reflected in the goodwill and cooperative spirit shown by the parties. The Court will consider the general state of compliance with the pending points of the Judgment rendered in this case, once it receives the relevant information. THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, in exercising its authority to monitor compliance with its decisions in accordance with Articles 33, 61(1), 62(3), 67, and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, Article 24 and 30 of the Statue, and Article 31.2 and 69 of its Rules of Procedure, DECIDES: 1. In accordance with the provisions of Considering Clauses 17, 29 and 35 of this Order, the State has complied with operative paragraphs set forth in the Judgment: a) make a public apology and recognition of international responsibility in relation to the violations set forth in [the] Judgment, the community where the family of Gerardo Vargas Areco, in the presence of the family and State civilian and military authorities, as part of which a plaque will installed in memory of the child Vargas Areco (operative paragraph ten of the Judgment); b) to publish in a nationally circulated newspaper, on a sole occasion, the chapter on proven facts of this Judgment, without the footnotes of the corresponding page, and the operative part of the [...] Judgment (operative paragraph thirteen of the Judgment), and c) to bring domestic legislation on voluntary recruitmentof minors under 18 years in the armed forces of Paraguay, in accordance with international standards in the field (operative paragraph fourteen of the Judgment). 26 In this regard, the State was informed that "when fixing of moratory interest for the payment of compensation for pecuniary damage and non-pecuniary, two points should be considered: 1) the time between the deadline to comply with the main obligation to pay and the date of payment, and 2) the time between the date of such payment and that on which all the moratory interests generated were paid. [...] Regarding the first period, the sum of the compensation plus the moratory interests for non-timely payment must be paid. Regarding the second period, the difference between the payment and debt (the capital plus the interest for the three month delay in payment), difference on which moratrory interests will still be charged up until the date of the full payment of the debt."