11 i. the Kankuamo indigenous community has suffered the displacement of almost one half its population due to the armed conflict; ii. in the period 2005-2006, threats increased, especially Kankuamo leaders. As a result, many were forcibly displaced; against iii. the militarization of the territory has been accompanied by several restrictions on the personal liberty and freedom of movement of the Kankuamo; iv. actions such as the control of schedules and activities by the Army and National Police have affected the freedom of movement of the groups living in the mountains; v. more than 400 families have been displaced to 4 main urban centers, and a holistic policy for socio-economic stabilization for these individuals does not exist, and vi. the displaced person recording system, apart from not recording the ethnicity of those affected, does not register individuals who have been the victim of forced displacement by State authorities. d) regarding the participation of implementation of the measures, that: the petitioners in the planning and i. due to the efforts as a whole between the State, the Kankuamo Community and the petitioners, important advances have been achieved within the implementation framework of the provisional measures; ii. in spite of these important advances, the implementation process lacks definitive monitoring of previous commitments, and holistic and adequate public policies to recognize and protect the Kankuamo’s own leadership, cultural integrity and identity, and its special relationship to its territory; iii. there is concern as to the minimal commitment various State entities have shown in their reception and implementation of agreements and established commitments, and iv. adequate compliance with the provisional measures should be done with due respect to the autonomy, identity, self-governance, traditions, and culture of the Kankuamo people, recognizing the special relationship that they have with their land. 9. The arguments put forward by the State at the pubic hearing (supra Having Seen 6), which reiterate its position from its previous briefs (supra Having Seen 3) emphasize: a) regarding the adoption of measures necessary to protect the life and the personal integrity of all members that compose the indigenous community of Kankuamo, that: i. the collaborative efforts by the petitioners, beneficiaries and organs of the State have resulted in the full compliance of the measures ordered by the Court;