Álvaro Colom Caballeros (2008-2012), for which it coordinated together with the representatives of the relatives, the transfer of those persons residing at different parts of the country to the city; moreover, the State provided them with meals and accommodation. Some State’s authorities attended the event. 13. It also informed regarding the duty to show the video on the facts of the Massacre of Las Dos Erres community during the ceremony and also “to show it at a public act in the capital of Petén and in a department of the western area in which grave human rights violations occurred during the internal armed conflict”6. It indicated that “together with the representatives of the relatives, it arranged for the presentation of the video on December 7, 2011, on the anniversary of the facts” and that this act took place in Santa Elena, Petén, with the presence of local authorities. It further alleged that “regarding the second act, it agreed with the victims’ representatives to carry it out in the Department of Alta Verapáz [and that] the schedule is still pending”. 14. The representatives confirmed that the public acts took place in the city of Guatemala and in Santa Elena in December 2011, with the participation of “the victims and in coordination with their representatives of FAMDEGUA". They expressed that “[a]ccording to the victims themselves, [said] acts constituted an important measure of satisfaction". They stated that they are waiting to be notified in relation to “the public act that is still pending" and that they are not aware of the distribution of the copies of the video to universities and public libraries. 15. The Inter-American Commission noted that “the parties agree about the public act of acknowledgement organized"; in addition, it "observ[ed] that the planning of the second act to show the video is still pending" and it considered that the State must present "detailed information regarding the distribution of the documentary video in several universities". 16. The Court takes note of the two public acts organized, in the city of Guatemala and Santa Elena, and of the presentation of the documentary video at the act held in Santa Elena. In this respect, taking into account the arguments presented by the representatives and the Commission (supra fourteenth and fifteenth considering paragraphs), in view of the fact that the former expressed their agreement with the manner in which the public acts took place, this Court considers that the State has complied with what was ordered in the fourteenth operative paragraph of the judgment, as to the organization of the two public acts and the presentation of the respective documentary video on the facts of the Massacre of Las Dos Erres community in one of the acts. 17. Moreover, the Court notes that it is still pending the obligation to show the video before mentioned “in a department of the western area in which grave human rights violations occurred during the internal armed conflict”7. In turn, the State has not presented information on the compliance with its duty, according to paragraph 263 of the judgment, to distribute the video as widely as possible. These measures must have been implemented within the term of one year, as of notice of the 6 Cf. Case of “Las Dos Erres” Massacre v. Guatemala. Preliminary Objection, Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of November 24, 2009. Series C N° 211, para. 263. 7 Cf. Case of “Las Dos Erres” Massacre v. Guatemala. Preliminary Objection, Merits, Reparations and Costs, para. 263. 5