3 11. on grounds of equity, that the State should abstain from executing, in all cases, regardless of the results of the new trials [...] Haniff Hilaire, George Constantine, Wenceslaus James, Denny Baptiste, Clarence Charles, Keiron Thomas, Anthony Garcia, Wilson Prince, Darrin Roger Thomas, Mervyn Edmund, Samuel Winchester, Martin Reid, Rodney Davis, Gangadeen Tahaloo, Noel Seepersad, Wayne Matthews, Alfred Frederick, Natasha De Leon, Vijay Mungroo, Phillip Chotalal, Naresh Boodram, Nigel Mark, Wilberforce Bernard, Steve Mungroo, Peter Benjamin, Krishendath Seepersad, Allan Phillip, Narine Sooklal, Amir Mowlah, Mervyn Parris, and Francis Mansingh; [...] 12. on grounds of equity, that the State should pay for non-pecuniary damage to the wife of Joey Ramiah, Carol Ramcharan, the sum of US $50,000 (fifty thousand United States of America dollars) or its equivalent in Trinidad and Tobago dollars (TTD) to support and educate their child, Joanus Ramiah [...]; [...] 13. on grounds of equity, that the State pay Joey Ramiah’s mother, Moonia Ramiah, the sum of US $10,000 (ten thousand United States of America dollars) or its equivalent in Trinidad and Tobago dollars (TTD) for non-pecuniary damage [...]; [...] 14. that the State should modify the conditions of its prison system to conform to the relevant international norms of human rights protection on the matter [...]; [...] 15. on grounds of equity, that the State should pay the representatives of the victims the sum of US $13,000 (thirteen thousand United States of America dollars) or its equivalent in Trinidad and Tobago dollars (TTD) as reimbursement for the expenses they have incurred in bringing this case before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights [...]; [...] 16. that the State, from the date of notification of the present Judgment, shall provide the Inter-American Court of Human Rights with a report every six months regarding the measures taken to implement the [...] Judgment, and [...] 17. that the Court shall oversee implementation of [the] Judgment and will deem the case to be closed once the State has duly complied with the terms of the [...] Judgment. 2. The January 16, 2003 brief by the Secretariat in which, under instructions by the President of the Court (hereinafter “the President”), it asked the State of Trinidad an Tobago (hereinafter “the State” or “Trinidad and Tobago”) to submit its first report on compliance with the Judgment on the merits and on reparations. 3. The August 1, 2003 note by the Secretariat of the Court (hereinafter “the Secretariat”) in which, under instructions by the President, it pointed out to the State its obligation to submit a report every six months regarding compliance with its orders in the June 21, 2002 Judgment. CONSIDERING: 1. It is an inherent power of the judicial functions of the Court to oversee compliance with its decisions.