CEJIL

- Libreria
- Registrarse

Diego García-Sayán President Manuel E. Ventura Robles Leonardo A. Franco Margarette May Macaulay Rhadys Abreu Blondet Alberto Pérez Pérez Eduardo Vio Grossi Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Secretary So ordered, Diego García-Sayán President Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Secretary 93

Seleccionar párrafo de destino3

● ● ●

Uwazi es desarrollado por
CEJIL
Libreria
Acceder

Información
17relaciones

Consejos de búsqueda

Buscar texto

Type something in the search box to get some results.

Tabla de Contenidos

I INTRODUCTION OFTHE CASE AND PURPOSE OF THE DISPUTE2
II PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COURT2
A.Provisional Measures5
B.Proceedings 5
C.Visit to the SarayakuPeople7
III COMPETENCE9
IV ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY9
V PRELIMINARY OBJECTION(Failure to exhaust domestic remedies11
VI EVIDENCE2
A.Documentary, testimonial, and expert evidence12
B.Admission of the documentary evidence13
C.Admission of the statements of presumed victimsand the testimonial and expert evidence14
D.Assessment of thefile onprovisional measures15
E.Assessment of the visit to the Sarayaku territory16
VII FACTS16
A.Theichwa Indigenous People of Sarayaku16
B.Oil exploration in Ecuador17
C.Award of territoriesto the Kichwa Peoples of Sarayaku and the Communities of the Bobonaza River in May 199218
D.Partnershipcontract with the CGC for exploration of hydrocarbons and exploitation of crude oil in Block 23 of the AmazonianRegion19
E.Facts prior to the seismic survey and incursions intotheterritory of theSarayaku People21
F. Application foramparo24
G. Facts related to the seismicsurvey andoil exploration activitiesof the CGC as of December 200224
H. Alleged threats and attacks against Sarayakumembers28
I. Facts subsequent to the suspensionof CGCactivities29
VIII MERITS31
VIII.1RIGHTSTO CONSULTATION AND TO INDIGENOUS COMMUNALPROPERTY31
A. Arguments of the parties 32
A.1 Right to Property, in relation to the Obligation to Respect Rights, Freedom of Thought and Expression,151and Political Rights32
A.2 Freedom of Movement and Residence34
A.3 Economic, Social andCulturalRights35
A.4 Domestic Legal Effects35
A.5 Obligation to Respect Rights 36
B.Theobligation to guarantee the right to consultation in relation to the rights to indigenous communalproperty and cultural identity of the Sarayaku Pe36
B.1The right to communal indigenous property36
B.2 The special relationship of the Sarayaku People with their territory37
B.3 Measures of protectionto guarantee the right to communal property39
B.4 The State’s obligation to guarantee the right to consultation of the Sarayaku People39
B.5 Application of the right to consultation of the Sarayaku People in this case50
a)Consultation must be carried outin advance51
b)Good faith and the aimofreaching anagreement52
c)Adequate and accessible consultation 56
d)Environmental Impact Assessment58
e)The consultation must be informed59
B.6The rights to consultation and to communal property in relation to the right to cultural identity 60
B.7Obligationto adopt provisions of domestic law63
B.8Right to freedom ofMovement and Residence 65
B.9Freedom of Thought and Expression, Political Rights, and Economic Social and Cultur65
B.10 Conclusion3
VIII.2 RIGHTS TO LIFE,TO PERSONAL INTEGRITY AND TO PERSONAL LIBERTY66
A.Arguments of the parties 66
A.1 Right to Life66
A.2Rights to personal integrity and to personal liberty67
B.Considerations of the Court 69
B.1In relation to the explosives buried on the Sarayaku territory69
B.2Alleged threats to members of the SarayakuPeople71
B.3Alleged attacks, unlawful arrest and restrictions on movement onthe Bobonaza River71
VIII.3RIGHTS TO A JUDICIAL GUARANTEES AND TO JUDICIAL PROTECTION72
A.Arguments of the partie72
B.Considerations of the Court 73
B.1Regarding the obligation to investigate 74
B.2Regarding the remedy ofamparo76
IX REPARATIONS (Application of Article 63(1) of the American Convention)77
A.Injured Party 78
B.Measures of restitutionandsatisfaction and guarantees ofnon-repetition78
B.1 Restitution 79
B.2 Guaranteesof non-repetition81
a)Due prior consultation81
b)Regulation of prior consultationin domestic law82
c)Training of State officials on the rights of indigenous peoples82
B.3Measures of satisfaction82
a)Public act of acknowledgment of internationalresponsibility 82
b)Publication and broadcasting of the judgment 83
C.Compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage 83
C.1 Pecuniary damage83
a)Arguments of the parties 84
b)Considerations of the Court 85
C.2 Non-pecuniary damage86
a)Arguments of the parties 86
b)Considerations of the Court 87
D.Costs and Expenses 88
D.1 Arguments by the parties88
D.2 Considerations of the Court 89
E.Reimbursement of expenses to the Victims’ Legal Assistance Fund 90
F.Method of compliance with the payments ordered90
G.Provisional measures90
X OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS91

Pueblo Indígena Kichwa de Sarayaku. Sentencia de 27 de junio de 2012

Sentencia de la Corte IDH

Preview

Tipo

Fondo
Reparaciones

Fecha: 27 jun 2012

Mecanismo

Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos

Número: C-245

País

Ecuador

Firmantes

Alberto Pérez Pérez
Diego García-Sayán
Eduardo Vio Grossi
Leonardo A. Franco
Manuel E. Ventura Robles
Margarette May Macaulay
Rhadys Abreu Blondet

Documentos primarios

Pueblo Indígena Kichwa de Sarayaku. Fondo y Reparaciones. Sentencia de 27 de junio de 2012.pdf
Spanish
Descargar Ver
Kichwa Indigenous People of Sarayaku. Merits and Reparations. Judgment of June 27, 2012.pdf
English
Descargar Ver
Pueblo Indígena Kichwa de Sarayaku. Sentença de 27 de junho de 2012.pdf
Portuguese
Descargar Ver

Archivos de soporte

Kichwa Indigenous People of Sarayaku. Merits and Reparations. Judgment of June 27, 2012.doc7.61 MB

Pueblo Indígena Kichwa de Sarayaku. Fondo y Reparaciones. Sentencia de 27 de junio de 2012.doc816.64 kB

Pueblo Indígena Kichwa de Sarayaku. Sentença de 27 de junho de 2012.docx488.71 kB

Sin referencias

References are parts of this document related with other documents and entities.

Mecanismo1
- Organismo1
Firmantes6
- Juez/a y/o Comisionado/a6
País1
- País1
No existe etiqueta1
- Causa1
Documentos de la CorteIDH8
- Resolución de Presidencia de la CorteIDH3
- Resolución de la Corte IDH2
- Audiencia3

Crear Referencia

Seleccionar tipo de relación

Relacionado a
CorteIDH
CIDH
Votos separados
Paises
Jueces intervinientes
País
Multi Select
Mecanismo
Firmantes
Sexo
Tipo
Firmante Voto separado
Estado
Descriptores
Geolocalización de los hechos del caso
Medidas de Protección

Consejos de búsqueda

Conectar a un párrafo

Connect to an entity

Disable highlights

Añadir a la tabla de contenidos

Notificaciones

Estás al día

La actividad nueva se mostrará aquí.