11 “express[ed] their conformity with the steps taken by the State [in that regard].12” In addition, it observes that the representatives’ assertions are not accompanied by any evidence of non-compliance by the State. Therefore, it reiterates that the State has complied with operative paragraph eight of the Judgment. THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, by virtue of its authority to monitor compliance with its own decisions pursuant to Articles 33, 62(1), 62(3), 65, 67, and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, and Articles 25(1) and 30 of the Statute and 31 and 69 of its Rules of Procedure,13 DECLARES THAT: 1. In conformity with that indicated in Considering paragraphs 11 and 22 of the instant Order, the State has fully complied with the following obligations: a) inform the relevant private institutions that they shall eliminate from their records any reference to Juan Carlos Chaparro Álvarez and Freddy Hernán Lapo Íñiguez as authors or suspects of the criminal act of which they were accused in this case (operative paragraph nine of the Judgment), and b) adapt its internal legislation to the parameters of the American Convention on Human Rights (operative paragraph eleven of the Judgment). 2. The State has partially complied with the obligation to disseminate the Judgment by television (operative paragraph ten of the Judgment), in conformity with that indicated in Considering paragraph 16. 3. It will maintain open the monitoring procedure until the obligations pending compliance in the instant case are complied with, in conformity with Considering paragraphs 16, 17, 26, 31, and 35, namely: a) disseminate the Judgment by radio and television (operative paragraph ten of the Judgment); b) adopt forthwith all the legislative, administrative or other measures necessary to eliminate ex officio the criminal record of those persons who are acquitted or whose cases are dismissed (operative paragraph twelve of the Judgment); c) submit to an arbitration procedure to establish the amounts corresponding to pecuniary damage for Mr. Chaparro (operative paragraph thirteen of the Judgment), and d) pay Mr. Chaparro the late bank interest in Ecuador indicated in paragraph 245 of the Judgment (operative paragraph fourteen of the Judgment). 12 Case of Chaparro Álvarez and Lapo Íñiguez v. Ecuador. Monitoring Compliance with Judgment. Order of the Court of April 29, 2009, considering eight. 13 Rules of Procedure approved by the Court in its LXXXV Ordinary Period of Sessions held from November 16 to 28, 2009.