17 “must take into account [their] position as guarantor[s] of the people’s fundamental rights.”20 THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, By virtue of the power conferred upon it by Article 63(2) of the American Convention on Human Rights and Rule 27 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court, DECIDES: 1. To reject the request for provisional measures filed by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights for the members of the Colombian Commission of Jurists. 2. To order that the Secretariat of the Court serve notice of the present Order on the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and the State of Colombia. 20 Cf. Case of Apitz Barbera et al. (“Corte Primera de lo Contencioso Administrativo”) v. Venezuela. Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations, and Costs. Judgment of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of August 5, 2008. Series C No. 182, para. 131; Case of Ríos et al. v. Venezuela. Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations, and Costs. Judgment of January 28, 2009. Series C No. 194, para. 139; and, Case of Perozo et al. v. Venezuela. Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations, and Costs. Judgment of January 28, 2009. Series C No. 195, para. 151.