Considerations of the Court 7. From the information submitted by the parties and the Inter-American Commission, as well as from the documents provided by Ecuador, the Court notes that, in accordance with paragraphs 84 and 101 to 104 of the Judgment, the State has complied with payment of the second tranche of the following obligations: a) Payment of fair compensation (second and fourth operative paragraphs of the Judgment), and b) Payment of interest accrued on pecuniary damage (third and fourth operative paragraphs of the Judgment). Based on the above, the following remains pending: c) Payment of the sum of US$11,223,000.00 (eleven million two hundred and twenty-three thousand United States dollars), in the corresponding tranches for fair compensation (second and fourth operative paragraphs of the Judgment on reparations), and d) Payment of the sum of US$5,661,454.50 (five million six hundred and sixtyone thousand four hundred and fifty-four United States dollars and fifty cents), in the corresponding tranches for pecuniary damage (third and fourth operative paragraphs of the Judgment on reparations). B. Obligation to publish in the Official Gazette the operative paragraphs of the Judgment on preliminary objection and merits, as well as paragraphs 2 and 3 of the Judgment on reparations and costs of March 3, 2011 8. The State advised that, on April 1, 2013, it had published the paragraphs and operative paragraphs corresponding to the Judgments of March 3, 2011, and May 6, 2008, in the Supplement to Official Gazette No. 923, as established in the fourteenth considering paragraph of the Order of October 24, 2012. 9. The representatives indicated in their brief of August 7, 2013, that, “on April 1, 2013, paragraphs 2 and 3 of the Judgment on reparations of March 3, 2011, as well as the operative paragraphs of this judgment, and also of the Judgment on merits of May 6, 2008, had been published in the Official Gazette of Ecuador.” Accordingly, “to date, the State has complied with what the Court ordered.” 10. In its communication of June 14, 2013 the Commission “assessed the publication that appeared in annex 3 of the State’s report and observe[d] that it was in keeping with the indications given by the Court.” Nevertheless, the Commission indicated that it “awaited information from the representatives in this regard.” Considerations of the Court 11. From the information presented, the Court notes that the State has complied with what was required in the Order of October 24, 2012 and, thus, has complied fully with what the Court ordered in the eighth operative paragraph of its Judgment on reparations. 4