6 Cantoral Contreras "to take a professional refresher course offered by the School of Anthropology of the Faculty of Social Sciences at the aforementioned university. The course would be geared towards obtaining a Bachelor’s Degree in Anthropology. 14. The representatives indicated that “the requests made for Brenda Cantoral [Contreras] and Pelagia Mélida Contreras Montoya de Cantoral were accepted by their respective universities. […] However, in the case of Vanessa Cantoral [Contreras] the Universidad Nacional Federico Villareal declared the waiver request for the costs of a refresher course and the university fees for a degree in psychology to be inadmissible in accordance with university autonomy.” The representatives argued that the State has partially complied with this reparatory measure with respect to exemption from tuition fees. However “in order to fully comply [with this measure, Pelagia Mélida Contreras and Brenda Cantoral] must be able to take refresher courses that are complementary to courses they have already completed.” Regarding Ulises Cantoral Huamaní, Marco Antonio Cantoral Lozano, and Ronny Cantoral Contreras, they reported that they would inform the State, at the appropriate time, of the decision to make use of this provision. Therefore, as regards these people, there has been no failure to comply with the aforementioned measure to date. 15. The Commission observed that the State failed to present updated information on the progress made with this obligation and stated its concern regarding the fact that the State has not referred to the obligation to award scholarships to Pelagia Mélida Contreras Montoya de Cantoral and Vanessa Cantoral Contreras. 16. In its previous Order, the Tribunal positively valued the efforts made by the State to help Brenda Cantoral Huamaní and Pelagia Mélida Contreras Montoya de Cantoral, and appreciated that certain academic fees had been waived. However, the Court does not have enough information regarding full compliance with the obligation they were awarded, and asks the State to submit updated and detailed information on compliance with this measure. 17. With respect to the fee waiver for Vanessa Cantoral Contreras, the documents provided by the representatives show that, despite the measures taken by the Justice Ministry and the Office for Scholarships and Educational Loans (OBEC in Spanish), the Universidad Nacional Federico Villareal “denied the request, stating that the university is autonomous with regard to its regulations, governance, academics, administration and finances, and that it is governed according to internal regulations such as its Rules and Regulations. It also indicate[d] that tuition costs could be paid with the reparation payments received.” 18. The Court recalls that in its Judgment it ordered the State to award a scholarship to study at a public Peruvian institution covering all the educational expenses incurred by the beneficiaries. The State was ordered to do so from the moment the beneficiaries make the request up until the completion of their post-secondary studies, training, or refresher course, be it technical or at a university, pursuant to paragraph 194 of the Judgment. The Tribunal did not define the process by which the scholarship would be awarded. Rather, it is incumbent on the State to undertake any internal measures needed to comply with this reparation measure. In light of this, and considering that it has not provided sufficient and up to date