7 information on this measure, the Tribunal requests that the State report on any progress made and steps that must be taken to achieve compliance. 19. With regard to the other beneficiaries, the Tribunal notes that for the State to comply with this obligation it involves, in part, those who want to use this reparation measure taking certain actions geared towards exercising their right to said measure. In this regard, the Court observes that the representatives indicated that they would eventually inform the State of their decision to use this reparation measure. The Tribunal stresses the importance of advancing with the coordination between the State and the representatives to comply with this obligation and requests that the State and the representatives continue reporting on efforts made and results obtained. c) Obligation to publish the relevant parts of the Judgment 20. With regard to the obligation to publish relevant parts of the Judgment in the Official Gazette and another widely-circulated national newspaper (tenth operative paragraph of the Judgment), the State asked the Court rule on the possibility of including “a link to the judgments of the Inter-American Court […] on the web pages of the main nationally circulated newspapers”. Likewise, it reported that on April 26, 2010, “the paragraphs […] provided for in the Judgment […] were published in the newspaper EXPRESO S.A., leaving the publication in the Official Gazette pending, which it [...] will report on soon.” 21. The representatives indicated that the State has not complied with the obligation to publish the Judgment. With regard to the request by the State concerning the possibility of including a link to the Court's judgments on the web pages of the main national newspapers, they indicated that the State “must comply with the order of the Judgment.” 22. The Commission reiterated that the State did not report on the publication of the Judgment in the Official Gazette. Furthermore, it indicated that the State must comply with the Court's order in accordance with the Judgment, regardless of additional ways that the State proposes. 23. The Tribunal notes that although the State submitted a copy of a letter send to the newspaper Expreso requesting the aforementioned publication, as well as a copy of the relevant paragraphs that the Tribunal ordered to be published, the information did not make it possible to determine actual compliance with the Court order. Furthermore, the representatives also pointed to the lack of compliance with this point. In addition, the Tribunal reiterates that the publication of the Judgment in the Official Gazette is still pending. As of result, the Court requests that the State provide information on the status of compliance with this reparation measure, including a copy of the publication made in the Expreso Newspaper on April 26, 2010 and a copy of the publication to be made in the Official Gazette. 24. Furthermore, with regard to the State’s proposal to place links on the web pages of the main nationally circulated newspapers, the Tribunal observes that the State reported that the print publication in a nationally circulated newspaper, which was ordered in the judgment, has already been carried out. It requests, therefore, that