13. The State shall, within a reasonable time, incorporate into the curriculum of the national education system, at all educational levels, a program of permanent education on the need to eradicate gender discrimination, gender stereotyping, and violence against women in Guatemala, in light of the respective international standards and the case law of this Court, as established in paragraphs 247 and 248 of this judgment. 14. The State shall, within a reasonable time, elaborate a scheduled plan to reinforce the National Institute of Forensic Science (INACIF), which includes an adequate allocation of resources to expand its activities over national territory and fulfill its mandate, as established in paragraph 254 of this judgment. 15. The State shall, within a reasonable time, implement full operation of the “special jurisdictional organs” throughout the Republic of Guatemala, together with the special prosecutor’s offices, as established in paragraph 257 of this judgment. 16. The State shall, within a reasonable time, implement permanent programs and courses for public officials of the Judiciary, the Public Prosecution Service and the National Civil Police, whose functions include the investigation of the murder of women, and train them in the proper application of the respective international law and this Court’s case law, as established in paragraph 258 of this judgment. 17. The State shall, within a reasonable time, adopt a national strategy, system, mechanism or program, by legislative or other means, to institute the immediate and effective search for missing women, as established in paragraphs 263 to 266 of this judgment. 18. The State shall, within one year of notification of this judgment, pay the sums established in paragraphs 274, 278, 279 and 283 as compensation for pecuniary and nonpecuniary damage, and to reimburse costs and expenses, in accordance with paragraphs 284 to 290 of this judgment. 19. The State shall, within one year of notification of this judgment, provide the Court with a report on the measures taken to comply with it. 20. The Court will monitor full compliance with this judgment in exercise of its attributed and in compliance with its obligations under the American Convention on Human Rights, and will consider this case concluded when the State has complied fully with all its provisions. Judge Roberto F. Caldas advised the Court of his Partially dissenting opinion, which is attached to this judgment. Judges Eduardo Vio Grossi and Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot advised the Court of their respective Concurring opinions, which are also attached to this judgment. 95