43. The Commission indicated that, “according to the information available, this aspect of the Judgment has been complied with fully.” 44. In this regard, the Court observes, first, that the State presented copies of the communications of September 16, 2011, in which it notified Martha Castro Mendoza and Tito, Raquel and Rebeca, all with the surnames Ibsen Castro, that the Central Bank of Bolivia had issued payment authorizations for the compensation for pecuniary and nonpecuniary damage, and to reimburse costs and expenses ordered in their favor in the Judgment.30 The representatives did not make any observations on these communications, or raise any objections. Consequently, the Court finds that the compensation indicated was available to the beneficiaries as of September 16, 2011, within the one-year period established in the Judgment, even though the payment of these amounts was only made on December 6 that year.31 45. Second, the Court observes that, in the above-mentioned communications of September 16, 2011, the victims were advised that “if they did not present the documentation [that accredited them as heirs of Messrs. Ibsen Peña and Ibsen Cárdenas] before September 30, 2011, a bank account would be opened in United States dollars in the Central Bank of Bolivia in favor of [the said] heirs […].” Furthermore, the State sent the Court a note dated December 7, 2011, signed by the International Operations Manager of the Central Bank of Bolivia, stating that the amounts of the compensation corresponding to José Luis Ibsen Peña and Rainer Ibsen Cárdenas had been deposited in a bank account.32 The representatives did not refer to this documentation, or provide information regarding the date on which the victims accredited their status as heirs of the said persons. Also, the Court observes that payment of the compensation corresponding to Messrs. Ibsen Peña33 and Ibsen Cárdenas34 was made to the beneficiaries in March and July 2012, respectively. 46. In this regard, the Court considers that the State proceeded to comply with this measure of reparation in a reasonable manner, because it notified the next of kin of the deceased victims of the need to accredit themselves as heirs before the time frame for the payment of the compensation established in the Judgment expired, and deposited the sums corresponding to Messrs. Ibsen Peña and Ibsen Cárdenas in a bank account until the necessary verifications had been made in order to make these payments. Consequently, the Court assesses the measures taken by the State and finds that it has complied with this measure of reparation. H) Request to hold a hearing on monitoring compliance                                                              30 Cf. Communications issued on September 16, 2011, by the Director General of Legal Affairs of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (file on monitoring compliance, tome I, folios 1152 to 1157). 31 The State provided vouchers confirming payment to Rebeca Ibsen Castro of US$55,000 and US$1,666.67; to Raquel Ibsen Castro of US$40,000 and US$1,666.66; to Martha Castro of US$50,000, and to Tito Ibsen Castro of US$50,000 and US$1,666.67. Cf. Annex 5 to the State’s report of February 25, 2013 (file on monitoring compliance, folios 1165 to 1179). 32 Cf. Note BCB-GOI-SOEXT-DOCC-CE-2011-638 of December 7, 2011, signed by the International Operations Manager of the Central Bank of Bolivia (file on monitoring compliance, tome II, folios 1663 and 1664). 33 The State provided a note of the Central Bank of Bolivia advising that Martha Castro, Rebeca Ibsen Castro, Raquel Ibsen Castro and Tito Ibsen Castro had each been paid the sum of US$38,750.00. Cf. Annex 5 to the State’s report of February 25, 2013 (file on monitoring compliance, tome II, folio 1203). 34 The State provided vouchers confirming payment to Rebeca Ibsen Castro, Raquel Ibsen Castro, Martha Castro and Tito Ibsen Castro of U$52,500 each. Cf. Annex 5 to the State’s report of February 25, 2013 (file on monitoring compliance, tome II folio 1225 to 1231). 15