similarity of the context and the facts that occurred in both cases, as well as the violations declared, the Court considers it pertinent to order the State to include the name of Edgar Fernando García on the plaque to be placed in this park or plaza so that it may also serve as a place where his next of kin can remember their loved one. This measure must be complied with in the terms established by the Court in the judgment in the Case of Gudiel Álvarez et al. (“Diario Militar”) v. Guatemala. C.2.b) Naming a street after Edgar Fernando García 211. The representatives asked that “Ninth Street between Second and Third Avenue of Guatemala City” be named after Edgar Fernando García, because that “is where the Rafael Aqueche National Institute is located, where he studied and graduated as a primary school teacher. 212. In the reparations agreement, the State indicated that “[t]his commitment was complied with […] on December 14 [2011], in the presence of the family members, in [a] ceremony [in which] a plaque was unveiled, naming the street after Edgar Fernando García.” 213. In this regard, the Court notes that, during the public hearing, the representatives acknowledged that the State had complied with “the measure to dignify the victim, […] by naming the street after him.” On previous occasions, the Court has assessed positively the actions taken by the States that recover the memory of the victims, recognize their dignity, and console their next of kin. 289 In the instant case, the Court appreciates the efforts made by the State to comply with measure of reparation and, therefore, endorses it as a form of compensation for the harm caused and considers that it represents a positive step by Guatemala in the fulfillment, in good faith, of its international treaty obligations. Consequently, the Court decides that this measure will not be included at the stage of monitoring compliance. C.2.c) Changing the name of a school to that of Edgar Fernando García 214. In the reparations agreement, the State indicated, with regard to the request of the representatives to change the name of the public school “Julia Ydigoras Fuentes” to that of Edgar Fernando García, that “[t]he Executive, through the corresponding authorities, undertakes to facilitate compliance with [the said] request […] in 2012.” 215. The Court assesses positively the State’s willingness to comply with this measure and, therefore, endorses it in to the terms agreed upon. 290 C.2.d) Delivery of ten study grants to next of kin of disappeared persons 216. The representatives asked that the State provide “[t]en study grants of Q. 25,000.00 each, to the children or grandchildren of persons who were forcibly disappeared, at the discretion of Edgar Fernando García’s family.” In its answering brief, the State indicated 289 Cf. Case of the “Street Children” (Villagrán Morales et al.) v. Guatemala. Reparations and costs. Judgment of May 26, 2001. Series C No. 77, para. 84, and Case of the Massacres of El Mozote and nearby places v. El Salvador, supra, para. 357. 290 The Court endorses this measure in the understanding that the obstacles indicated by Guatemala in its answering brief to changing the name of the “Julia Ydigoras Fuentes” public school to that of Edgar Fernando García, were overcome subsequently, since it undertook to facilitate this measure in the reparations agreement. 71