12 35. In its observations, the representatives deemed it necessary for the State to provide specific information on the “action taken to pay the corresponding compensatory amounts to the beneficiaries who, to date, had not claimed them". They further argued that said amount, according to the terms of paragraph 121 of the Judgment (supra Having Seen 2), should be deposited in dollars and in the most favorable terms in a solvent institution in order to guarantee prompt access thereto whenever the victims claim it. 36. The Commission stated that, regarding the information furnished by the parties, it is waiting for details on the deposits made to the people who had still not claimed their financial reparation. 37. The Court notes that the reports presented by the State and the observations of the representatives do not provide information about the persons who had still not appeared before the competent authorities to receive the corresponding compensation, or the status of the payments to persons with similar names, information that the Tribunal has repeatedly requested from the State and the representatives. Likewise, the State has not informed on the opening of an account or issuance of a deposit certificate in a banking institution in order to guarantee payment to the people in the circumstances set forth in paragraph 121 of the Judgment. 38. In view of the fact that there is no sufficient information to assess the state of compliance with all the compensatory payments ordered in the Judgment, the Tribunal reiterates the need for the parties to forward updated and individualized information on the status of the outstanding compensations for victims, be it because they had not yet appeared before the corresponding authorities or because they have identical or similar names, as it was determined in certain cases. The forwarding of such information in the term set forth in operative paragraph two of this Order is of utmost importance. THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, in exercising its authority to monitor compliance with its decisions in accordance with Articles 33, 61(1), 62(3), 65, 67, and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, Article 25(1) and 30 of the Statue, and Article 31(2) and 69 of its Rules of Procedure, DECIDES: 1. According to the terms of this Order, the State has complied with the translation of the American Convention on Human Rights into Maya-Achí, the dissemination of the translation in the municipality of Rabinal and its delivery to the victims (operative paragraph four of the Judgment on Reparations). 2. In accordance with the present Order, the State has partially complied with the following operative paragraph in relation to the following operative paragraphs of the Judgment on Reparations: